DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTIONS), CIRCLE, PUNE, SWARGATE, PUNE vs. SHREE CHANAKYA EDUCATION SOCIETY, AUNDH ,PUNE
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the statement of the accommodation entry provider indicated he only started providing such bills from January 2018, which was after the purchases in question. Furthermore, the assessee's substantial excess application of income negated the need for bogus transactions. Consequently, the addition and the penalty were deleted.
What were the facts?
The Revenue alleged that the assessee, a charitable trust, made bogus purchases of Rs. 1,84,99,795/- from a shell entity. The Assessing Officer made an addition under Section 68, treating these purchases as unexplained credit. The assessee contended that its application of income far exceeded its receipts, making bogus purchases unnecessary.
What were the issues?
Whether the purchases made by the assessee were genuine, and if not, whether the addition and subsequent penalty were justified based on the evidence.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 68,Section 271(1)(c),Section 147,Section 11,Section 12A,Section 148,Section 142(1),Section 143(1),Section 132(4),Section 115BBE
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(13)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- H.R. Mehta v. Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax, Mumbai125 citing72 Taxmann.com 110 · 2016 · HC
- PCIT v. Shapoorji Pallonji & Co Ltd.33 citing117 Taxmann.com 625 · 2020 · HC
- 249 ITR 533 (Bom) and CIT(E) v. Audyogik22 citing101 Taxmann.com 247 · 2019 · HC
- Sejal Jewellary v. Union of India20 citing171 Taxmann.com 846 · 2025 · HC
- PCIT v. Naveen Kumar Gupta16 citing168 Taxmann.com 574 · 2024 · HC
- 136/289 Taxman 238 (SC); Pr. CIT v. Shapoorji Pallonji & Co. Ltd.15 citing141 Taxmann.com 509 · 2022 · SC
- CIT v. Apeejay Education Society14 citing59 Taxmann.com 102 · 2015 · HC · Read judgment
- Ashok Kumar Rungta v. ITO10 citing167 Taxmann.com 429 · 2024 · HC
- Tirupati Construction Company v. Income-tax Officer\n10 citing165 Taxmann.com 176 · 2024 · HC
- Amar Jewellers Ltd. v. ACIT9 citing137 Taxmann.com 249 · 2022 · HC
- 6: (i) Kisnichand Chellaram vs. CIT (1980) 125 ITR 713 (S.C.) (ii) Laxmnbhai S Patel v. CIT8 citing172 Taxmann 74 · 2008 · HC
- Obulapuram Mining Company (P.) Ltd. v. DCIT8 citing43 SOT 32 · 2011 · ITAT
- CIT v. Maharashtra Academy of Engineering and Educational Research4 citing161 Taxmann.com 290 · 2024 · HC
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, PUNE BENCH “A”, PUNE
Before: SHRI R. K. PANDA & MS ASTHA CHANDRA
आदेश की प्रतितिति अग्रेतिि/Copy of the Order is forwarded to: 1. अपीलार्थी / The Appellant; 2. प्रत्यर्थी / The Respondent 3. The concerned Pr.CIT, Pune 4. DR, ITAT, ‘A’ Bench, Pune गार्ड फाईल / Guard file. 5. आदेशानुसार/ BY ORDER, // True Copy //
Senior Private Secretary आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण ,पुणे / ITAT, Pune
S.No. Details Date Initials Designation 1 Draft dictated on 04.08.2025 Sr. PS/PS 2 Draft placed before author 07.08.2025 Sr. PS/PS Draft proposed & placed before the 3 JM/AM Second Member Draft discussed/approved by Second 4 AM/AM Member 5 Approved Draft comes to the Sr. PS/PS Sr. PS/PS 6 Kept for pronouncement on Sr. PS/PS 7 Date of uploading of Order Sr. PS/PS 8 File sent to Bench Clerk Sr. PS/PS Date on which the file goes to the Head 9 Clerk 10 Date on which file goes to the A.R. 11 Date of Dispatch of order
More judgments on Section 68
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
- Bliss Dealtrade Private Limited, Kolkata vs Income Tax Officer - Ward 9(2) Kolkata…ITA 208/KOL/2026[2012-13]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-13
- Hemal Paresh Madeka, Rajkot vs Asst.Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 955/RJT/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Ajaybhai Dineshbhai Bagdai, Near Central… vs The Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(2)(1), New…ITA 74/RJT/2026[2013-14]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2013-14
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Jharkhand Contractors Association Thro Its President- Pramod Kumar vs. Bharat Coking Coal LTD. Thro Its Chairman Cum Managing DirectorJharkhand · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Isc Processors Private Limited vs. Superintendent,Range-Iv, Burrabazar Div, CGST And Cx, Kolkata (N) Commissionerate And AnrCalcutta · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Raashi Constructions vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of Commercial TaxesKarnataka · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Bidasaria Fenster Solutions vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 13 Oct 2026
- Amit Agency vs. Commissioner, CGST And CxPatna · 13 Oct 2026