SHRI BAHUBALI VIDYAPEETHA,KOLHAPUR vs. CIT EXEMPTION, PUNE, PUNE

PDF · subscribers
ITA 149/PUN/2025Status: DisposedITAT Pune20 August 2025Bench: Dr. MANISH BORAD (Accountant Member), SHRI VINAY BHAMORE (Judicial Member)1 pages

In favour of the assessee: the assessee's appeal was allowed. From the AI summary of this appeal.

AI SummaryAllowed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal restored the issue back to the file of the CIT(E) for necessary adjudication, granting the assessee one more opportunity to furnish the required details and present their case.

What were the facts?

The assessee, a charitable trust registered in 1963 for imparting education, applied for approval under Section 80G(5) of the Income Tax Act. The CIT(E) rejected the application for non-submission of certain required details.

What were the issues?

Whether the CIT(E) erred in rejecting the application for approval under Section 80G(5) due to non-submission of certain details, and if the assessee should be granted another opportunity to present the information.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 80G,Section 80G(5),Section 12A

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, B BENCH, PUNE

Before: Dr. MANISH BORAD & SHRI VINAY BHAMORE

For Appellant: Shri Pramod S Shingte
For Respondent: Shri Amit Bobde-CIT
Hearing: 21.08.2025

Assessee by : Shri Pramod S Shingte Revenue by : Shri Amit Bobde-CIT Date of hearing : 21.08.2025 Date of : 03.09.2025 pronouncement आदेश/ORDER PER DR. MANISH BORAD, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER :- This appeal at the instance of assessee is directed against the order of Ld. CIT(E), Pune framed u/s 80G of the Income Tax Act, 1961 dated 13.12.2024.

2.

The sole greviance of the assessee is that Ld. CIT(E) erred in rejecting the application filed by the assessee for granting approval u/s 80G(5) of the Act.

3.

At the outset Ld. Counsel for the assessee submitted that the assessee is a Charitable Trust registered in the year 1963 with the primary object of imparting Education. Assessee Trust is duly registered u/s 12A of the Act. He fairly submitted that certain details called for by Ld. CIT(E) could not be furnished but now the assessee possess all the details and want to submit them before Ld. CIT(E). Prayer made to provide one more opportunity to go before Ld. CIT(E). Reference made to the documents filed in the Paper Book running into 364 pages.

4.

On the other hand Ld. Departmental Representative (DR) though supported the impugned order but fairly did not oppose to the request made by Ld. Counsel for the assessee.

5.

We have heard rival contentions and perused the record placed before us. The application for approval u/s 80G(5) of the Act has been rejected for non submission of certain details called for by Ld. CIT(E) to examine the claim of the assessee made in the application filed on Form No. 10AB under clause (iii) of first proviso to section 80G(5) of the Act. Considering the request made by Ld. Counsel for the assessee and in the larger interest of justice, we hereby restore the issues raised in the instant appeal back to the file of Ld. CIT(E) for necessary adjudication and to decide in accordance with law. Needless to mention that proper opportunity of hearing shall be granted to the assessee. Assessee is also directed to remain vigilant and not to take adjournment unless otherwise required for reasonable cause. Effective grounds of appeal raised by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes.

6.

In the result appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes.

Order pronounced on this 03rd day of September, 2025.

More judgments on Section 80G

All 6,482 judgments and leading authorities on Section 80G →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →