BROSE INDIA AUTOMOTIVE SYSTEMS PRIVATE LIMITED,PUNE vs. ACIT CIR-1(1), , PUNE
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that the Ld. Departmental Representative had no objection to the withdrawal of the appeal. Considering the finalization of the APA agreement covering the disputed transactions, the Tribunal allowed the assessee's request and dismissed the appeal as 'Withdrawn'.
What were the facts?
The assessee, Brose India Automotive Systems Private Limited, filed an appeal against an assessment order for AY 2015-16. Subsequently, the assessee entered into an Advance Pricing Agreement (APA) with the CBDT, which covered the assessment year under appeal and the international transactions in dispute. Consequently, the assessee filed an application to withdraw the appeal before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal.
What were the issues?
Whether an appeal filed by an assessee can be withdrawn by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal following the finalization of an Advance Pricing Agreement (APA) with the CBDT, which covers the assessment year and the international transactions under dispute in the appeal.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, PUNE BENCHES “C”, PUNE
Before: DR.MANISH BORAD & SHRI VINAY BHAMORE
PER DR. MANISH BORAD, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER :
The captioned appeal at the instance of assessee pertaining to Assessment Year 2015-16 is directed against the order dated 19.10.2019 passed by Ld. Assessing Officer u/s.143(3) r.w.s.144C(13) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
Before us, assessee has filed an application dated 15.09.2025 seeking withdrawal of the appeal. The relevant contents of the said application reads as under :
Ld. Departmental Representative has no objection for withdrawal of the appeal filed by the assessee. We therefore allow the request of the assessee to withdraw the appeal filed by it.
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as ‘Withdrawn’.
Order pronounced at the time of hearing itself, i.e. on 13th October, 2025.
More judgments on Section 144C(13)
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Autoform Sales Gmbh, Hyderabad vs ADIT (International Taxation) - 1, HyderabadITA 486/HYD/2026[2023-24]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2023-24
- Autoform Sales Gmbh, Hyderabad vs ADIT (International Taxation) - 1, HyderabadITA 498/HYD/2025[2022-23]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
- Cornerstone Ondemand International Limited… vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 2128/MUM/2025[2022-23]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
- Cornerstone Ondemand International Limited… vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 4558/MUM/2023[2021-22]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Pooja, Town Hallroad, Cuttack vs. State Tax Officer, Cuttack-I West Circle,CuttackOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- M/S Chicvogue Fashions Lip, Ganjam vs. State Tax Officer Bhubaneswar- Ii CircleOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- M/S Priya, Townhall Road, Cuttack vs. Superintendent Cuttack- I Range, CuttackOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- Dwaraka Jewellers, Bhubaneswar vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- M/S N D Waddar And Co vs. Sri Gaurav GuptaKarnataka · 30 Oct 2026