Loading judgment…
Facts
The assessee filed an appeal before the Tribunal with a delay of 187 days. The assessee also faced a delay in filing an appeal before the CIT(A) due to alleged reasonable cause, which resulted in dismissal in limine.
Held
The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing the appeal before it, citing justice-oriented approach and judicial precedents. It also condoned the delay in filing the appeal before the CIT(A) and remitted the matter back to the CIT(A) for fresh adjudication on merits.
Key Issues
Whether the delay in filing the appeals before the Tribunal and the CIT(A) was sufficiently explained by reasonable cause, and whether the matter should be remanded for fresh adjudication on merits.
Sections Cited
144, 143(2), 142(1), 249(2)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Detected automatically from the text. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, PUNE BENCHES “B”, PUNE
Before: DR.MANISH BORAD & SHRI VINAY BHAMORE
PER DR. MANISH BORAD, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER :
The captioned appeal at the instance of assessee pertaining to A.Y. 2017-18 is directed against the order dated 08.11.2024 framed by Addl/JCIT(A), Udaipur emanating out of Assessment Order dated 24.12.2019 passed u/s.144 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short ‘the Act’).
Registry has informed that there is delay of 187 days in filing the appeal before this Tribunal. Assessee has filed an affidavit explaining the delay.
On perusing the averments made in the Affidavit, we are satisfied that ‘reasonable cause’ prevented the assessee to file the appeal within the stipulated time. We note that the delay is not intentional and assessee would not have gained from filing the appeal with a delay. We therefore taking justice oriented approach and taking guidance from the judgments of Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of Collector, Land Acquisition, Anantnag & Anr. Vs. Mst. Katiji & Ors. reported in (1987) 2 SCC 107 and in the case of Inder Singh Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh judgment dated 21.03.2025 (2025 INSC 382) condone the delay of 187 days in filing of the instant appeal before this Tribunal and admit the appeal for adjudication.
At the outset, ld. Counsel for the assessee submitted that ld.CIT(A) has not dealt with merits of the case since the delay in filing of the appeal before ld.CIT(A) has not been condoned and the appeal has been dismissed in limine and not found in conformity with the provisions of section 249(2) of the Act. He submitted that ‘reasonable cause’ prevented the assessee from filing an appeal before ld.CIT(A) in the prescribed time limit. He therefore prayed that delay in filing of appeal before ld.CIT(A) may please be condoned and the matter may be restored to the ld.CIT(A) by granting one more opportunity to the assessee to go before ld.CIT(A) for necessary adjudication on merits.
On the other hand, ld. DR supported the order of ld.CIT(A).
We have heard the rival contentions and perused the record placed before us. We observe that the assessee is a Private Limited Company and nil income declared in the return for A.Y.2017-18 on 24.10.2017 along with carry forward of claim of business losses at Rs.1,25,48,919/-. After the case being selected for scrutiny by CASS followed by validly serving statutory notices u/s.143(2) and 142(1) of the Act ld. Assessing Officer carried out the assessment proceedings. However, the assessee failed to respond to the notices issued by ld. AO leaving no option for ld.AO to conclude the proceedings as Best Judgment Assessment u/s.144 of the Act on 24.12.2019 making various additions totalling to Rs.76,86,180/-. However, ld. AO gave benefit of forward of brought forward losses and the remaining amount of losses to be carried forward has been calculated at Rs.48,62,739/-. Assessee preferred appeal before ld.CIT(A) but the same was filed on 21.02.2023 and after the exclusion of limitation period due to covid-19 pandemic period by the Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of Cognizance for Extension of Limitation In re (2022) 441 ITR 722 (SC), still there was delay of approximately 11 months. We find that assessee has not gained by delaying the filing of appeal before ld.CIT(A) and therefore in the larger interest of justice and being fair to both the parties we condone the delay in filing of appeal before ld.CIT(A). So far as merits of the case are concerned, we deem it appropriate to afford one more opportunity to the assessee to go before ld.CIT(A) for afresh adjudication. In view therefore, without dwelling into merits of the case, the issues raised in the instant appeal are remitted back to the file of ld.CIT(A). Needless to mention that in the set aside proceedings Ld CIT(A) shall afford reasonable opportunity to the assessee to file necessary details. Assessee is also directed to remain vigilant and not to take adjournment unless otherwise required for reasonable cause. Impugned order is set aside and the effective grounds raised by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes.
In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes.
Order pronounced on this 29th day of October, 2025.