EXCELRA KNOWLEDGE SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-8(1), HYDERABAD
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal admitted additional grounds raised by the assessee. It remanded the issues of book profit computation and leave encashment deduction to the Assessing Officer for fresh adjudication. The issue of double addition on interest income was also remanded for verification.
What were the facts?
The assessee, Excelra Knowledge Solutions P Ltd, appealed against the CIT(A)'s order for AY 2020-21. The appeal involved issues concerning the taxation of interest income, disallowance of expenditure under Section 43B, and computation of book profit under Section 115JB.
What were the issues?
Whether interest income earned by an SEZ unit on surplus funds is eligible for deduction under Section 10AA, and whether the computation of book profit and leave encashment deduction were correctly handled.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(9)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- National Thermal Power Co. Ltd. v. CIT5,834 citing229 ITR 382 · 1998 · SC
- CIT v. Sterling Foods311 citing237 ITR 579 · 1999 · SC · Read judgment
- CIT v. Vasisth Chay Vyapar Ltd.125 citing330 ITR 440 · 2011 · HC
- CIT v. Hewlett Packard Global Soft Ltd.120 citing403 ITR 453 · 2017 · HC · Read judgment
- Orissa State Warehousing Corpn v. CIT114 citing237 ITR 589 · 1999 · SC
- CIT v. Menon Impex (P.) Ltd.42 citing128 Taxmann 11 · 2003 · HC
- CIT v. Pentasoft Technologies Ltd.23 citing347 ITR 578 · 2012 · HC
- TRO v. Custodian, Special Court Act14 citing293 ITR 369 · 2007 · SC
- India Comnet International v. Income Tax Officer12 citing354 ITR 673 · 2013 · SC
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad ‘ B ‘ Bench, Hyderabad
Before: Shri Vijay Pal Rao, Vice-Shri Madhusudan Sawdia
Per Vijay Pal Rao, Vice President This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order dated10/02/2023 of the learned CIT (A)-NFAC Delhi, relating to A.Y.2020-21. 2. The assessee has raised the following grounds:
The assessee has also raised the following additional grounds:
“1. Ld A.O/Ld CIT(A), NEAC erred in taxing the interest Income of Rs. 4,40,41,931 under income from other sources and Income
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 10AA
- Quantium Analytics Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward 16(3), HyderabadITA 1336/HYD/2024[2021-22]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2021-22
- Ab Knowledge Systems, Pune vs DCIT, PuneITA 92/PUN/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed25 Sept 2026AY 2020-21
- ACIT-Circle-4(1)(1), Bangalore vs Eygbs(India) Private Limited, BangaloreITA 1886/BANG/2024[2012-13]Status: Disposed21 Sept 2026AY 2012-13
- ACIT 15(1)(2), Mumbai vs Galaxy Surfactants Limited, MumbaiITA 6984/MUM/2025[2011-2012]Status: Disposed15 Sept 2026AY 2011-2012
- Genpact Infrastructure (Hyderabad) Pvt… vs ITO, New DelhiITA 2055/DEL/2015[2009-10]Status: Disposed9 Sept 2026AY 2009-10
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S South INDIA Trading Company vs. Additional Commissioner Adjudication CGST Delhi North & Anr.Delhi · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Rishi Stonex vs. The State Of Assam And 5 OthersGauhati · 13 Oct 2026
- Gopal Datt vs. Vishal Kumar SharmaUttarakhand · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Do Nam Enterprise And Anr vs. The Union Of INDIA And 2 OrsGauhati · 13 Oct 2026
- M Sundaravel vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of Central GST And Central ExciseMadras · 13 Oct 2026