PUDAMI INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. DCIT., CIRCLE-5(1), HYDERABAD
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that the assessee had opted for the Vivad-se-Vishwas Scheme and had submitted Form No.3. The Revenue had no objection. The appeal was accordingly dismissed as withdrawn.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against the order of the CIT(A)-NFAC. During the hearing, the assessee submitted that they had opted for the Vivad-se-Vishwas Scheme to settle the tax dispute.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeal can be dismissed as withdrawn due to settlement under Vivad-se-Vishwas Scheme.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad ‘ A ‘ Bench, Hyderabad
Before: Shri Laliet KumarA N D Shri Manjunatha, G.
(िनधा�रण वष�/Assessment Year: 2013-14) Pudami Industries (P) Ltd, Vs. Dy. CIT Hyderabad Circle 5(1) PAN:AAGCP3957L Hyderabad (Appellant) (Respondent) िनधा��रती �ारा/Assessee by: Shri P. Vinod, Advocate राज� व �ारा/Revenue by: Shri B Bala Krishna, CIT(DR) सुनवाई की तारीख/Date of hearing: 03/02/2025 घोषणा की तारीख/Pronouncement: 03/02/2025 आदेश/ORDER Per Laliet Kumar, J.M This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order dated 24/07/2024 of the learned CIT (A)-NFAC Delhi, relating to A.Y.2013-14.
At the time of hearing, the learned AR of the assessee has submitted that the assessee has opted for Vivad-se-Vishwas Scheme of 2024 to settle the tax dispute involved in the present appeal. The competent authority has issued Form No.3, copy of which is filed on record. Thus, the learned AR has submitted that Page 1 of 3 the assessee is seeking permission to withdraw the appeal as the dispute has been settled under the Vivad-se-Vishwas Scheme 2024.
The learned DR has raised no objection, if the present appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn in view of the settlement of dispute under Vivad-se-Vishwas.
Having considered the submissions of both the parties and going through the record, we find the assessee has filed an application for seeking permission to withdraw the present appeal in view of the tax dispute settled under Vivad-se-Vishwas Scheme, 2024. Since the competent authority has issued Form No.3, consequently, the assessee is allowed to withdraw the present appeal. Accordingly, the present appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn since the assessee has already opted for Vivad-se-Vishwas Scheme, 2024. The assessee can approach the Tribunal in case the settlement is not accepted by the Department under Vivad se Vishwas Scheme 2024, for whatsoever may be the reason, then the assessee shall be at liberty to file Miscellaneous Application before the Tribunal within the time limit prescribed under the Act to reinstate assessee's appeal. Ordered accordingly.
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as 'withdrawn'.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Imtiyaz Shaikh Z Chorlekar vs. Salman ShaikhBombay · 21 Oct 2026
- Dr Babasaheb Ambedkar Marathwada University Thr Its Registrar Prashant S Amrutkar vs. Union Of INDIA Thr The Secretary And OthersBombay · 19 Oct 2026
- Babasaheb Ambedkar Marathwada University Thr Registrar Prashant S Amrutkar vs. Union Of INDIA Thr Secretary And OthersBombay · 19 Oct 2026
- Vinishma Technologies Private Limited vs. State Of KarnatakaKarnataka · 17 Oct 2026
- Vinishma Technologies Private Limited vs. State Of KarnatakaKarnataka · 17 Oct 2026