RAJEEV SINDHI,HYDERABAD vs. ITO., WARD-3(1), HYDERABAD
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad ‘ B ‘ Bench, Hyderabad
Ůित रवीश सूद, जे.एम./PER RAVISH SOOD, J.M.
The present appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order passed by the Commissioner of Income-Tax (Appeals),
National Faceless Appeal Center (NFAC), Delhi, dated 14/10/2024, which in turn arises from the order passed by the A.O under Section 2
271D of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (in short ‘the Act’) dated 29/03/2023
for the assessment year 2020-21. 2. The Learned Authorized Representative (“AR”, for short) for the assessee, at the threshold of hearing, submitted, that as the assessee had opted for the “Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2024"
(“DTVSV”, for short) therefore, as per instructions he seeks to withdraw the captioned appeal.
3. Per contra, the Ld. Departmental Representative (“DR”, for short) did not raise any objection.
4. Having heard both the sides, we hereby dismiss the appeal of the assessee as withdrawn with a liberty to him to approach the Tribunal if for any reason his case is not finally settled under the DTVSV.
5. In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as 'withdrawn'.
19th माच[, 2025 को खुलȣ अदालत मɅ सुनाया गया आदेश।
Order pronounced in the Open Court on 19th March, 2025. (मंजूनाथ जी)
(MANJUNATHA G.)
लेखा सद˟/ACCOUNTANT MEMBER (Įी रवीश सूद)
(RAVISH SOOD)
Ɋाियक सद˟/JUDICIAL MEMBER 3
Hyderabad, dated 19.03.2025. **OKK/sps
आदेशकी Ůितिलिप अŤेिषत/ Copy of the order forwarded to:-
िनधाŊįरती/The Assessee : Rajeev Sindhi Flat No. 203, Akarshan Banjara, Road, No.3, Hyderabad, Telangana-500034. 2. राजˢ/ The Revenue : Income Tax Officer, Ward-3(1), Signature Towers, Kondapur, Hyderabad, Telangana-500084. 3. The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Hyderabad 4. िवभागीयŮितिनिध, आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण, हैदराबाद / DR, ITAT, Hyderabad 5. The Commissioner of Income Tax 6. गाडŊफ़ाईल / Guard file
आदेशानुसार / BY ORDER
Sr. Private Secretary
ITAT, Hyderabad