SRINIVAS GOURISHETTY,JANGAON vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-3, WARANGAL

ITA No 237 of 2025 Srinivas Gourishetty
Page 1 of 2

आयकर अपीलȣय अͬधकरण, हैदराबाद पीठ
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
Hyderabad ‘ SM-B ‘ Bench, Hyderabad

Before Shri Vijay Pal Rao, Vice-President
A N D
Shri Manjunatha, G. Accountant Member

आ.अपी.सं /ITA No.237/Hyd/2025
(िनधाŊरण वषŊ/Assessment Year: 2017-18)

Shri Srinivas Gourishetty
JANGAON
PAN:AUAPG3830A
Vs.
Income Tax Officer
Ward – 3
Warangal
(Appellant)

(Respondent)

िनधाŊįरती Ȫारा/Assessee by:
N O N E
राज̾ व Ȫारा/Revenue by::
Shri D. Praveen, DR

सुनवाई की तारीख/Date of hearing:
25/03/2025
घोषणा की तारीख/Pronouncement: 26/03/2025

आदेश/ORDER
Per Vijay Pal Rao, Vice President

This appeal by the assessee is directed against the order dated, 5/10/2024 of the learned CIT (A)/ADDL/JCIT (A)
Bhubaneswar, for the A.Y.2017-18. 2. None appeared on behalf of the assessee when the appeal was called for hearing. The Registry has reported that this appeal is a duplicate appeal filed by the assessee against the same order of the learned CIT (A), as earlier the assessee filed an appeal in ITA No.23/Hyd/2025 which was decided by the Tribunal, vide order dated 30/01/2025. A copy of the earlier order of the Tribunal dated 30/01/2025 is also placed on record. Thus,

ITA No 237 of 2025 Srinivas Gourishetty
Page 2 of 2

it is transpired from the record that the present appeal is a duplicate appeal filed by the assessee against the same order of the learned CIT (A) dated 4/10/2024 and further, the assessee has referred the same challan for payment of appeal fee as referred in the earlier appeal filed in ITA No.23/Hyd/2025. Accordingly, this appeal of the assessee is not maintainable being a duplicate appeal when the earlier appeal filed by the assessee has already been disposed of by this Tribunal and consequently, the same is dismissed being non-est.

By Order