MODEL N INDIA SOFTWARE PRIVATE LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. ACIT., CIRCLE- 5(1), HYDERABAD

PDF · subscribers
ITA 942/HYD/2024Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad07 April 2025Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao, Vice-President A N D Shri Madhusudan Sawdia (Accountant Member)3 pages
AI SummaryWithdrawn

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal acknowledged the assessee's decision to settle the tax dispute under the Vivad-Se-Vishwas Scheme, 2024, and the payment of the determined tax. Consequently, the application for withdrawal was allowed, and the appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.

What were the facts?

The assessee filed an appeal against an assessment order for AY 2020-21. Subsequently, the assessee opted for the Vivad-Se-Vishwas Scheme, 2024, settled the tax liability by paying the amount determined in Form-2, and requested to withdraw the appeal.

What were the issues?

Whether the appeal should be dismissed as withdrawn given that the assessee had settled the tax dispute under the Vivad-Se-Vishwas Scheme, 2024.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 143(3),Section 144C(13)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad ‘ DB-A ‘ Bench, Hyderabad

Before: Shri Vijay Pal Rao, Vice-Shri Madhusudan Sawdia

Hearing: 07/04/2025

आयकर अपील�य अ�धकरण, हैदराबाद पीठ IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL Hyderabad ‘ DB-A ‘ Bench, Hyderabad Before Shri Vijay Pal Rao, Vice-President A N D Shri Madhusudan Sawdia, Accountant Member आ.अपी.सं /ITA No.942/Hyd/2024 (िनधा�रण वष�/Assessment Year: 2020-21) Model N India Software Vs. ACIT Private Limited, Hyderabad Circle 5(1) PAN:AAGCM3217N Hyderabad (Appellant) (Respondent) िनधा��रती �ारा/Assessee by: CA Isha Mahawar राज� व �ारा/Revenue by:: Shri Srinath Sadanala, DR सुनवाई की तारीख/Date of hearing: 07/04/2025 घोषणा की तारीख/Pronouncement: 07/04/2025 आदेश/ORDER

Per Vijay Pal Rao, Vice President

1.

This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order passed u/s 143(3) r.w.s. 144C(13) of the I.T. Act, 1961 dated 26/07/2024 for the A.Y 2020-21.

2.

At the time of hearing, the learned AR of the assessee has submitted that the assessee has opted for Vivad-Se-Vishwas Scheme, 2024 to settle the tax dispute for the year under consideration. He has referred to Form-2 issued by the designated

Page 1 of 3 authority and submitted that the assessee has already paid the tax liability determined under the Vivad-Se-Vishwas Scheme, 2024. Thus, the learned AR has submitted that the assessee does not want to pursue the present appeal and prayed for withdrawal of the same.

3.

On the other hand, the learned DR has raised no objection, if the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn in view of the assessee opted for Vivad-Se-Vishwas Scheme, 2024 to settle the tax dispute.

4.

Having considered the rival submission and careful perusal of the record, we find that the assessee has filed an application dated 20/03/2025 seeking withdrawn of the present appeal, in view of the fact that the assessee opted for Vivad-Se- Vishwas Scheme, 2024 to settle the tax liability arising from the impugned assessment order. The competent authority has issued Form-2, dated 17/03/2025 whereby the tax payable under Vivad- Se-Vishwas Scheme, 2024 for final settlement is determined which is already paid as mentioned in Form-2 itself and the balance payment amount is shown as ‘NIL’. Thus, the assessee has also paid the amount of tax payable as determined by the competent authority under Vivad-Se-Vishwas Scheme, 2024. Accordingly, in the facts and circumstances of the case, when the assessee has opted for Vivad-Se-Vishwas Scheme, 2024 and also paid the tax as determined by the competent authority while

Page 2 of 3 issuing Form-2, the present appeal of the assessee is allowed to be withdrawn and consequently, the same is dismissed being withdrawn.

5.

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.

More judgments on Section 144C(13)

All 3,426 judgments and leading authorities on Section 144C(13) →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →