MARUTHI CONSTRUCTIONS,HYDERABAD vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-8(3), HYDERABAD
ITA No 91 of 2025 Maruthi Constructions
Page 1 of 2
आयकर अपीलȣय अͬधकरण, हैदराबाद पीठ
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
Hyderabad ‘ DB-A ‘ Bench, Hyderabad
Before Shri Vijay Pal Rao, Vice-President
A N D
Shri Madhusudan Sawdia, Accountant Member
आ.अपी.सं /ITA No.91/Hyd/2025
(िनधाŊरण वषŊ/Assessment Year: 2017-18)
Maruthi Constructions
Hyderabad
PAN:AAMFM5200E
Vs.
Income Tax Officer
Ward 8(3)
Hyderabad
(Appellant)
(Respondent)
िनधाŊįरती Ȫारा/Assessee by:
N O N E
राज̾ व Ȫारा/Revenue by::
Shri Srinath Sadanala, DR
सुनवाई की तारीख/Date of hearing:
08/04/2025
घोषणा की तारीख/Pronouncement: /04/2025
आदेश/ORDER
Per Vijay Pal Rao, Vice President
This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order dated 20/06/2024 of the learned CIT (A)-NFAC Delhi, for the A.Y.2017-18. 2. None appeared on behalf of the assessee when the appeal was called for hearing, despite the notices issued to the assessee through RPAD as well as on the Email ID given in Form-
36. Further, it transpires from the record that this appeal is filed belatedly and there is a delay of 145 days in filing the present appeal. The assessee has also not signed and verified the memorandum of the appeal in Form-36 as well as grounds of ITA No 91 of 2025 Maruthi Constructions
Page 2 of 2
appeal. Therefore, the appeal has not been made in the manner as prescribed u/s 253 r.w. rule 47 of I.T. Rules, 1962. The registry has issued the notices to the assessee pointing out for removal of defects of not signing/verification of the memorandum of appeal as required under rule 47 r.w.s. 140 of the I.T. Act, 1961. Since there is a delay of 145 days in filing the present appeal and despite the defect notices issued to the assessee, the assessee has neither filed any application/affidavit for condonation of delay explaining the cause of delay, nor removed the defect of non- signing and verification of the memorandum of appeal in Form-
36. Accordingly, the present appeal of the assessee is found to be invalid and liable to be dismissed in limine being barred by limitation as well as unsigned and unverified appeal. We order accordingly.
In the result, appeal of the assessee is dismissed being not maintainable. Order pronounced in the Open Court on 9th April, 2025. (MADHUSUDAN SAWDIA) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER (VIJAY PAL RAO) VICE-PRESIDENT Hyderabad, dated 9th April, 2025 Vinodan/sps Copy to: S.No Addresses 1 Maruthi Constructions. Plot No.36, Road 2, Balaji Nagar, Miyapur Cross Road, Hyderabad 500003 2 Income Tax Officer Ward 8(3) Signature Towers, Opp: Botanical Garden, Hyderabad 500084 Telangana 3 Pr. CIT - Hyderabad 4 DR, ITAT Hyderabad Benches 5 Guard File
By Order