JHUNJHUNU BALAJI MOTORS PVT. LTD.,JAIPUR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, JHUNJHUNU
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal observed that the assessee's conduct indicated a lack of interest in pursuing the appeal. Following established precedents, the appeal was dismissed for want of prosecution.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against the order of the CIT(A) for the Assessment Year 2009-10. At the time of hearing, no one appeared on behalf of the assessee, and no adjournment was sought.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeal should be dismissed due to the assessee's non-appearance and lack of interest in pursuing the case.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(2)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- CIT v. Multiplan India Ltd.2,267 citing38 ITD 320 · 1991 · ITAT
- Estate of Late Tukojirao Holkar v. CWT2,040 citing223 ITR 480 · 1997 · HC
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, JAIPUR BENCHES, JAIPUR
Before: SHRI BHAGCHAND, AM vk;dj vihy la-@ITA No. 640/JP/2017
PER SHRI BHAGCHAND ,AM.
This appeal filed by the Assessee is directed against the order of Ld. CIT (A)-
III, Jaipur, Rajasthan dated 22.09.2016 pertaining to the Assessment Year 2009-10.
At the time of hearing, no one appeared on behalf of the assessee. There is
also no application for adjournment. Therefore, this conduct of assessee shows that
assessee is not interested in pursuing its appeal. In these circumstances, following
the decision of Delhi Bench of ITAT in the case of CIT vs. Multiplan India (P) Ltd.,
(1991) 38 ITD 320 and also on the judgment of the Hon’ble M.P. High Court in the
case of Estate of Late Tukhoji Rao Holkar vs. CWT (1997) 223 ITR 480 (MP), the
appeal of the assessee is dismissed for want of prosecution.
In the result, appeal of the assessee stands dismissed.
Order is pronounced in the open court on 07/12/2017.
2 ITA No. 640/JP/2017. Jhunjhunu Balaji Motors Pvt. Ltd.
Sd/- ( HkkxpUn ½ ( BHAGCHAND) ys[kk lnL;@Accountant Member
Jaipur Dated:- 07/12/2017. Pooja/ आदेश की प्रतिलिपि अग्रेषित@ब्वचल वf जीम वतकमत वितूंतकमक जवरू 1. The Appellant- Jhunjhunu Balaji Motors Pvt. Ltd. 2. The Respondent – The ACIT, Circle- Jhunjhunu. 3. The CIT(A). 4. The CIT, 5. The DR, ITAT, Jaipur 6. Guard File (ITA No. 640/JP/2017) vkns'kkuqlkj@ By order,
सहायक पंजीकार@ Aेेपेजंदज. त्महपेजतंत
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Manoj Kumar Das vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S Superwealth Financial Enterprises Private Limited, Khordha vs. Joint Commissioner Good And Service Tax Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Simanchal Sahoo vs. Commissioner Of CT And GST, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Prafulla Chandra Khatua, Mayurbhanj vs. The State Tax Officer Of CT And GST, MayurbhanjOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S.Sidhivinayak Roadways, Sundergarh vs. Commissioner Of GST And Central Excise, Rourkela Commissionerate, RourkelaOrissa · 15 Oct 2026