EYEGEAR OPTICS INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. DCIT., CIRCLE - 8(1), HYDERABAD
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the CIT(A) erred in remanding the matter without adjudicating the assessee's grounds challenging the AO's jurisdiction, particularly regarding the time-bar for reassessment. The Tribunal set aside the CIT(A)'s order and restored the matter to the CIT(A) for adjudication of the jurisdictional issue.
What were the facts?
The Assessing Officer (AO) reopened the assessment of Eyegear Optics India Private Limited for AY 2012-13 and 2013-14 under Section 147 r.w.s 144 of the Income Tax Act, disallowing referral fees paid to doctors. The CIT(A) set aside the assessment order and remanded it back to the AO.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(A) has the power to remand the case without deciding the jurisdictional grounds raised by the assessee, and whether the reassessment proceedings were initiated beyond the prescribed time limit.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(1)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- CIT v. Kelvinator of India Ltd.1,673 citing187 Taxmann 312 · 2010 · SC · Read judgment
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad ‘A’ Bench, Hyderabad
आदेशकी प्रनतनलनप अग्रेनर्त/ Copy of the order forwarded to:- 1. निर्धाररती/The Assessee : M/s Eyegear Optics India Private Limited, 8-2- 277/A & A9, Plot No.9, Soudagar’s Silver Breeze, Road No.2, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad 2. रधजस्व/ The Revenue : The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle- 8(1), Signature Towers, Kondapur, Hyderabad 3. The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Hyderabad 4. नवभधगीयप्रनतनिनर्, आयकर अपीलीय अनर्करण, हैदरधबधद / DR, ITAT, Hyderabad 5. गधर्ाफ़धईल / Guard file
आदेशधिुसधर / BY ORDER
Sr. Private Secretary ITAT, Hyderabad
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Kavya Shrivastava vs. Hdfc Bank LTD.Madhya Pradesh · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S Gaurav Jewellers Through Proprietor Gaurav Barjatiya vs. Branch Manager Yes Bank LTD.Madhya Pradesh · 15 Oct 2026
- Kavya Shrivastava vs. State Bank Of INDIAMadhya Pradesh · 15 Oct 2026
- Paresh Textiles Prop Paresh Gudhka vs. Superintendent Range Iv Div VBombay · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S Palladium Constructions PVT LTD. vs. Principal Commissioner Of Central TaxKarnataka · 15 Oct 2026