PREMIER POULTRY PRODUCTS PRIVATE LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. DCIT., CIRCLE-5(1), HYDERABAD
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal dismissed the assessee's appeal, affirming that the assessee's financial statements clearly indicated its main business was poultry trading, and income from hiring out lorries was an independent stream, not integral to its core operations. Relying on the Supreme Court judgment in CIT Vs. Gupta Global Exim (P.) Ltd., the Tribunal held that higher depreciation is applicable only if the assessee is primarily in the business of running vehicles on hire, which was not established in this case.
What were the facts?
The assessee, primarily engaged in poultry product trading, claimed a higher depreciation rate of 30% on its motor lorries for AY 2015-16, arguing they were also used for transportation on hire. The Assessing Officer, acting on directions from the Pr. CIT under Section 263, restricted the depreciation to 15%, disallowing an excess of Rs. 83,65,917/-, a decision upheld by the CIT(A).
What were the issues?
Whether the assessee, primarily engaged in poultry trading but also generating freight income from hiring out its motor lorries, is entitled to a higher depreciation rate of 30% on these lorries, or if the standard rate of 15% applies because its main business is not transport on hire.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(1)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- CIT v. Gupta Global Exim P. Ltd.34 citing305 ITR 132 · 2008 · SC · Read judgment
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad ‘ A ‘ Bench, Hyderabad
आदेशकी प्रनतनलनप अग्रेनर्त/ Copy of the order forwarded to:-
1. 1. निर्धाररती/The Assessee : Premier Poultry Products Private Limited, 5-5-597, Abhyudaya Nagar, Chintakunt, L.B. Nagar – 500074, Hyderabad, Telangana. 2. रधजस्व/ The Revenue : The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle – 5(1), Hyderabad.
More judgments on Section 263
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Neo Structo Construction P. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The Pr. CIT- 3, AhmedabadITA 1216/AHD/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- Vimal Harilal Baldania, Gandhidham vs The ITO Ward 2, GandhidhamITA 770/RJT/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1493/KOL/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1492/KOL/2026[2013-2014]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2013-2014
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Akshaya Consortium vs. The Assistant Commissioner (St)Andhra Pradesh · 28 Oct 2026
- Dipanshu Aggarwal vs. Director General Of GST IntelligenceDelhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Dezinetree Projects PVT. LTD. vs. Spokes Digital Inc And AnrDelhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Jaydeep Jayantilal Hudaka vs. State Of GujaratGujarat · 28 Oct 2026
- Commissioner/Additional Commissioner Of Central Tax vs. M/S INDIA Agro Exports Private LimitedKarnataka · 28 Oct 2026