SHAKTI HORMANN PRIVATE LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. DCIT., CIRCLE - 3(1), HYDERABAD
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal, considering that the assessee's grievance was addressed by a rectification order under Section 154, allowed the withdrawal of the appeal. Consequently, the appeal filed by the assessee was dismissed as withdrawn.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against an intimation/order issued under Section 143(1) of the Income Tax Act for A.Y. 2019-20. During the hearing, the assessee's counsel informed the Tribunal that the grievance had been redressed by the Assessing Officer via a rectification order under Section 154, leading the assessee to seek withdrawal of the appeal.
What were the issues?
Whether the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal should permit the withdrawal of an appeal when the underlying grievance has been resolved by a rectification order passed by the Assessing Officer.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad ‘A’ Bench, Hyderabad
Before: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Manjunatha G.
PER VIJAY PAL RAO, VICE PRESIDENT:
This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order dated 06.12.2024 of the Addl/JCIT(A)-2, Noida, arising from intimation/order u/s 143(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (“the Act”) of CPC for the A.Y.2019-20.
At the time of hearing, the learned counsel for the assessee has stated at Bar that the grievance of the assessee has been redressed by the AO, while passing the rectification order u/s 154 r.w.s.143(1) of the Act dated 16.12.2022 and therefore, the assessee does not want to press the present appeal and the same may be allowed to be withdrawn. He has filed a copy of the order dated 16.12.2022 passed u/s 154 of the Act. The Ld.AR has also filed a petition for withdrawal of the appeal, which reads as under:
Thus, he has pleaded that the present appeal of the assessee be allowed to be withdrawn.
On the other hand, the Ld.DR has raised no objection, if the present appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.
Having considered the submissions of the Ld.AR as well as the Ld.DR and in view of the rectification order passed u/s 154 of the Act dated 16.12.2022, the present appeal of the assessee is allowed to be withdrawn and consequently, the same is dismissed, being withdrawn.
In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed, being withdrawn.
Order pronounced in the Open Court on 30th July, 2025.
More judgments on Section 154
- Income Tax Officer, Jaipur vs Rakesh Kumar Malani, JaipurITA 1425/JPR/2026[2025-26]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2025-26
- Income Tax Officer, Jaipur vs Anita Sharma, JaipurITA 1344/JPR/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Ramtirath Bawa, Nagpur vs ITO Ward3(4), NagpurITA 327/NAG/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Mohinder Singh, Nagpur vs ITO Ward 3(4), NagpurITA 322/NAG/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Ramakrishna Reddy Makireddy, Hyderabad vs ACIT, Circle-5(1), HyderabadITA 70/HYD/2026[2007-08]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2007-08
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Iyyanan Eswaran vs. The Appellate Deputy Commissioner (St) (GST)Madras · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Dc Security Services vs. Commissioner Of Central Goods And Services TaxUttarakhand · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Shreekanth Enterprises vs. Joint Commissioner AppealsUttarakhand · 14 Oct 2026
- Sharad Ashok Agarwal vs. State Of Maharashtra Through G.P. And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026
- Md. Akhtar Ansari, Proprietor Of M/S Indian Associates vs. State Of Jharkhand, Through Commissioner Of State Tax, Commercial Tax Dept.Jharkhand · 14 Oct 2026