ANITHA MYADAM,HYDERABAD vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-7(1), HYDERABAD
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the assessee's claim that she was merely a consenting party as a legal heir to avoid litigation needs verification. While the sale deed received the entire consideration by parties Sl. 1 to 12, the assessee's inclusion as a vendor needs to be examined against the original partition deed.
What were the facts?
The assessee sold an immovable property and did not disclose the long-term capital gain (LTCG). The AO initiated proceedings under Section 147, considering the sale consideration as LTCG. The assessee claimed she was a consenting party as a legal heir to avoid future litigation, not the actual owner.
What were the issues?
Whether the assessee, appearing as a vendor in a sale deed, is liable for capital gains tax when she claims to be a consenting party as a legal heir and not the actual owner, requiring verification of ownership and purpose of inclusion.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 147,Section 148,Section 144,Section 142(1),Section 46A
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad ‘A’ Bench, Hyderabad
आदेशकी प्रनतनलनप अग्रेनर्त/ Copy of the order forwarded to:- 1. निर्धाररती/The Assessee : Smt.Anitha Myadam, H.No.14-11-887, Beerbhanbagh, Nayabasthi, Begum Bazar, Hyderabad 2. रधजस्व/ The Revenue : The Income Tax Officer, Ward-7(1), Signature Towers, Sy.No.6(P), Kondapur, Hyderabad 3. The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Hyderabad 4. नवभधगीयप्रनतनिनर्, आयकर अपीलीय अनर्करण, हैदरधबधद / DR, ITAT, Hyderabad 5. गधर्ाफ़धईल / Guard file
आदेशधिुसधर / BY ORDER
Sr. Private Secretary ITAT, Hyderabad
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Sureshchandra Moolchand Shah vs. State Of GujaratGujarat · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Larsen And Toubro Limited vs. Joint Commissioner Of Central GST And Anr.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- T C Global INDIA Private Limited vs. Principal Commissioner Of Central GST, North DelhiDelhi · 27 Oct 2026
- Kamlasana Impex Private Limited vs. Director General Of GST Intelligence (Hq) Delhi) & Anr.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- Ritu Gautam Proprietor Of Ms Heritage International vs. Additional Commissioner Central Goods And Services Tax Appeals Ii Delhi & Anr.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026