KARUTURI VEERA VENKATA RAVI PRASAD,KOVVUR MANDAL vs. ACIT., CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(2), AAYAKARBHAVAN, HYDERABAD

PDF · subscribers
ITA 797/HYD/2025Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad29 October 2025AY 2020-21Bench: SHRI G. MANJUNATHA, HON’BLE (Accountant Member), SHRI RAVISH SOOD, HON’BLE (Judicial Member)1 pages
AI SummaryDismissed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal held that the assessee could not reconcile the entries in the seized documents with the income declared in the returns for the HUF and his father's name. Therefore, the additions made by the AO and sustained by the CIT(A) were upheld.

What were the facts?

During a search operation, loose sheets and diaries detailing the assessee's finance business were seized. The Assessing Officer (AO) made additions for unexplained investment in fixed deposits and income from the finance business, totaling Rs. 36,65,800, as these amounts were not declared in the return.

What were the issues?

Whether additions made by the AO based on seized documents related to finance business are sustainable when the assessee claims the income was offered in the hands of HUF and father, and whether the seized documents are admissible as evidence.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 132,Section 153A

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Cases cited in this judgment(4)Show list

Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad ‘ A ‘ Bench, Hyderabad

आदेशकी प्रनतनलनप अग्रेनर्त/ Copy of the order forwarded to:-

1. 1. निर्धाररती/The Assessee : Karuturi Veera Venkata Ravi Prasad, R/o.1-130, Near Brahmana Veedhi, Vadapalli, Kovvur Mandal, Andhra Pradesh - 534350. 2. रधजस्व/ The Revenue : The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle – 2(2), Hyderabad.

More judgments on Section 132

All 14,598 judgments and leading authorities on Section 132 →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →