Facts
The assessee's case for A.Y. 2016-17 and 2017-18 was reopened under Section 147, leading to an addition of Rs. 3,52,01,026/- under Section 69A for unexplained cash deposits. The CIT(A) dismissed the assessee's appeal ex-parte. There was a 105-day delay in filing the appeal to the Tribunal, attributed to the CIT(A) sending notices to an inactive email ID.
Held
The Tribunal condoned the delay, finding the reasons genuine and bonafide. Following a Telangana High Court judgment which quashed notices issued under Sections 148A and 148, the Tribunal similarly quashed the assessment orders passed by the A.O. under Section 147 read with Section 144 for both assessment years, granting liberty to either party for revival based on the Supreme Court's decision on a pending SLP.
Key Issues
1. Condonation of delay in filing appeal. 2. Validity of reassessment notices under Sections 148A and 148 and consequential assessment orders in light of a High Court decision.
Sections Cited
147, 144, 250, 148, 142(1), 69A, 148A, 151A, 144B
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad ‘ A ‘ Bench, Hyderabad
आदेशकी प्रनतनलनप अग्रेनर्त/ Copy of the order forwarded to:-
1. 1. निर्धाररती/The Assessee : Mohd. Noorul Huda, R/o.18-7-198/A/1214/A, Murad Mahal, Talab Katta, Hyderabad - 500053 2. रधजस्व/ The Revenue : The Income Tax Officer, Ward – 9(1), Hyderabad.