HIGHRADIUS TECHNOLOGIES PRIVATE LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE -2(1), HYDERABAD
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that an intimation under Section 143(1)(a) is invalid if issued after a notice under Section 143(2) has been served. Therefore, the disallowance based on the invalid intimation was set aside.
What were the facts?
The assessee's return was processed under Section 143(1)(a) after a notice under Section 143(2) was issued. The AO made a disallowance of Rs. 13,13,770/- under Section 43B based on this 143(1)(a) intimation.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was the validity of an intimation under Section 143(1)(a) issued after the commencement of regular assessment proceedings under Section 143(2). Another issue concerned the disallowance of leave encashment expenses under Section 43B.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 143(1),Section 143(2),Section 43B,Section 143(3),Section 144C(13),Section 144B,Section 270A
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(4)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- CIT v. Agnity India Technologies (P.) Ltd.171 citing36 Taxmann.com 289 · 2013 · HC
- CIT v. Gujarat Electricity Board19 citing260 ITR 84 · 2003 · SC
- ADP (P.) Ltd. v. Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax, Hyderabad10 citing135 Taxmann.com 44 · 2022
- Indeed India Operations (P.) Ltd. v. Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax4 citing143 Taxmann.com 212 · 2022
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad ‘A’ Bench, Hyderabad
आदेशकी �ितिलिप अ�ेिषत/ Copy of the order forwarded to:- 1. िनधा�रती/The Assessee : M/s HighRadius Technologies Private Limited, First Floor, Building 12C, Raheja Mindspace IT Park, Madhapur Road, Hyderabad 2. राज�/ The Revenue : The DCIT, Circle-2(1), Signature Towers, Hyderabad 3. The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Hyderabad 4. िवभागीय �ितिनिध, आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण, हैदराबाद / DR, ITAT, Hyderabad 5. गाड�फ़ाईल / Guard file
आदेशानुसार / BY ORDER
Sr. Private Secretary ITAT, Hyderabad
More judgments on Section 43B
- Vco Consulatatns and Sevices Private… vs ITO, Corporate Ward 3(3), ChennaiITA 2145/CHNY/2025[2019-20]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Siemens Gamesa Renewable Power Private… vs The Dy CIT Circle 8(2)(1), MumbaiITA 8020/MUM/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- Amritvarsha Industries Limited, Ambedkar… vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 6481/DEL/2026[2010-2011]Status: Disposed7 Oct 2026AY 2010-2011
- Karaj Singh, Haryana vs PCIT (Central) Gurgaon, GurgaonITA 642/CHANDI/2026[2022-23]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
- ACIT, Mumbai vs Imp Powers Limited, MumbaiITA 4982/MUM/2025[2012-13]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2012-13
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Ramesh K Devadiga And Ors vs. Khernagar Nandadeep Co-Operative Housing Society LTD And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026
- Permender Singh vs. Union Of INDIA And Ors.Calcutta · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Abdhish Dhal Samanta, Bhubaneswar vs. Chief Commissioner, CT And GST, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Kniit Net Industries Private Limited, Khurda vs. Superintendent Of CGST And Central Excise, Bhubaneswar Ii CircleOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Maa Swarnapai Chemicals (Opc) Private Limited, Cuttack vs. Sales Tax Officer, Cuttack IOrissa · 14 Oct 2026