ACIT., CIRCLE-5(1), HYDERABAD vs. MADINENI SITARAMAIAH, HYDERABAD

ITA 598/HYD/2025Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad24 December 2025AY 2018-1923 pages
AI SummaryAllowed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal held that the assessee failed to rebut the statutory fiction under Section 2(22)(e). Subsequent repayments or adjustments do not alter the fact that dividend was received when the monies were paid by the company.

What were the facts?

The assessee, a substantial shareholder in a closely held company, received unsecured loans from it. The Assessing Officer (AO) treated these loans as 'deemed dividend' under Section 2(22)(e) of the Income Tax Act, considering the company's accumulated profits.

What were the issues?

Whether loans advanced by a closely held company to a substantial shareholder can be treated as 'deemed dividend' under Section 2(22)(e) of the Income Tax Act, and whether subsequent repayments affect this treatment.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 2(22)(e)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Cases cited in this judgment(5)Show list

Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad ‘A’ Bench, Hyderabad

Heard together (2 matters)

I.T.A.No. 598/Hyd/2025
CO No. 16/Hyd/2025

Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.

""त रवीश सूद, जे.एम./PER RAVISH SOOD, J.M:

The present appeal filed by the

The order continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

More judgments on Section 2(22)(e)

All 1,757 judgments and leading authorities on Section 2(22)(e) →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →