Facts
The assessee, Deepshikha Trading Company Pvt. Ltd. (amalgamated company), appealed against the non-granting of TDS credit of INR 1,23,331 and advance tax of INR 1,75,000 pertaining to the amalgamating company, GMB Investments Pvt. Ltd., in its AY 2018-19 assessment under Section 143(3). The Ld. CIT(A) dismissed the appeal as infructuous, holding that the cause of action arose from the Section 143(1) intimation, not the Section 143(3) order.
Held
The Tribunal ruled that the amalgamated company is eligible for the tax credits of the amalgamating company, as the income corresponding to these credits was taxed in the assessee's hands. It found the CIT(A)'s dismissal of the appeal as infructuous incorrect, stating that the demand from Section 143(1) was subsumed by the Section 143(3) order, and directed the AO to allow the claimed TDS and advance tax credits.
Key Issues
Whether an amalgamated company can claim TDS and advance tax credit of the amalgamating company; and whether the CIT(A) correctly dismissed the appeal as infructuous by holding the cause of action lay against the Section 143(1) intimation instead of the Section 143(3) assessment order.
Sections Cited
250, 143(3), 143(3A), 143(3B), 143(1), 143(2), 246A, 154, 199, 198, 244A
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, KOLKATA ‘SMC’ BENCH, KOLKATA
Before: SHRI SONJOY SARMA & SHRI RAKESH MISHRA
order
: January 14th, 2025 ORDER
PER RAKESH MISHRA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER:
This appeal filed by the assessee is against the order of the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-NFAC, Delhi [hereinafter referred to as “the Ld. CIT(A)”] passed u/s 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act”) for AY 2018-19 dated 31.07.2024, which has been passed against the assessment order u/s 143(3)/143(3A)/143(3B) of the Act, dated 12.02.2021.