ASANSOL DIVISION LICI EMPLOYEES COOP MULTIPURPOSE SOCIETY LIMITED,ASANSOL vs. D.C.I.T., CIRCLE - 1,, ASANSOL
In favour of the assessee: the assessee's appeal was allowed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal found that the assessee had provided reasonable cause for the delay in filing the appeal before the Ld. CIT(A), considering the COVID period and the non-action on the Section 154 application. Consequently, the delay was condoned, and the Ld. CIT(A)'s order dismissing the appeal was set aside. The matter was restored to the Ld. CIT(A) for a fresh decision on merits after providing a reasonable opportunity of hearing.
What were the facts?
The assessee challenged the disallowance of its Section 80P claim made in an intimation under Section 143(1). The assessment order was passed during the COVID Pandemic, and the disallowance was made by the CPC without providing an opportunity. After an unaddressed rectification application under Section 154, the assessee filed an appeal before the Ld. CIT(A) which was dismissed in limine on grounds of limitation without merits.
What were the issues?
Whether the Ld. CIT(A) was justified in dismissing the appeal in limine due to delay, and if the assessee had sufficient cause for the delay in filing the appeal.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, KOLKATA ‘B’ BENCH, KOLKATA
Before: SRI SANJAY GARG & SRI SANJAY AWASTHI
order
: 16.01.2025 ORDER
Per Sanjay Awasthi, Accountant Member:
The present appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order dated 14.06.2024 of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Addl/JCIT(A)-2, Guwahati [hereinafter referred to as Ld. 'CIT(A)'] passed u/s. I.T.A. No.: 1668/KOL/2024 Assessment Year: 2019-20 Asansol Division LICI Employees Coop Multipurpose Society Limited 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the “Act”) for Assessment Year 2019-20.
The assessee in this appeal is aggrieved by the action of the Ld. CIT(A) in dismissing the appeal of the assessee on the ground of limitation without adjudicating the same on merits. The assessee in this appeal has agitated the disallowance of claim made by the assessee u/s. 80P of the Act in the intimation/assessment done u/s. 143(1) of the Act.
At the outset, the Ld. Counsel for the assessee has submitted that the impugned assessment order was passed on 29.10.2020, which was during the COVID Pandemic period and even the aforesaid disallowance was made by the CPC in an intimation u/s. 143(1) of the Act without giving opportunity to the assessee and beyond the jurisdiction of the CPC u/s. 143(1) of the Act. The assessee preferred a rectification application u/s. 154 of the Act to the AO/CPC for rectification of the said order since the said application was not considered for long time, the assessee under the circumstances preferred an appeal before the Ld. CIT(A). It was explained before the Ld. CIT(A) that the delay in filing the appeal before the ld. CIT(A) was not intentional, rather it was mainly due to the fact that the intimation order u/s. 143(1) of the Act was passed during the COVID Period. Further, there was no action taken by the AO on the application moved by the assessee u/s. 154 of the Act. The Ld. CIT(A), however, did not condone the delay in filing the appeal and dismissed the appeal in limine.
We have heard the rival contentions and gone through the record. We are of the view that the assessee has duly explained the reasons for delay in filing the appeal before the Ld. CIT(A) and the same, in our view, constitute reasonable cause for the delay caused in filing the appeal before the Ld. CIT(A). We, therefore, set aside the order of the Ld. CIT(A) and restore the matter to the file of the ld. CIT(A) with a direction to decide the appeal on merits. The delay, if any, occurred in filing the appeal before the Ld. CIT(A) is Page 2 of 3 I.T.A. No.: 1668/KOL/2024 Assessment Year: 2019-20 Asansol Division LICI Employees Coop Multipurpose Society Limited hereby condoned. Needless to say, that the ld. CIT(A) will pass a speaking order after affording reasonable opportunity of hearing to the assessee.
More judgments on Section 80P
- Shree Bandharda Seva Sahkari Mandli Ltd… vs Income Tax Officer Ward -4, JunagadhITA 881/RJT/2025[2019-20]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Duddukuru Primary Agricultural Cooperative… vs ITO, Ward - 1, TadepalligudemITA 258/VIZ/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Parthasaradhi Mutually Aided Co-Operative… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward-17(1), HyderabadITA 2322/HYD/2026[AY 2016-17]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026
- Jijamata Mahila Gramin Bigar Sheti Sahakari… vs ITO Ward -1, BhandraITA 102/NAG/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed12 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Shri Na vs Ari Khedut Sahkari Society Ltd…ITA 362/SRT/2025[2016-17]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2016-17
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Imtiyaz Shaikh Z Chorlekar vs. Salman ShaikhBombay · 21 Oct 2026
- Dr Babasaheb Ambedkar Marathwada University Thr Its Registrar Prashant S Amrutkar vs. Union Of INDIA Thr The Secretary And OthersBombay · 19 Oct 2026
- Babasaheb Ambedkar Marathwada University Thr Registrar Prashant S Amrutkar vs. Union Of INDIA Thr Secretary And OthersBombay · 19 Oct 2026
- Vinishma Technologies Private Limited vs. State Of KarnatakaKarnataka · 17 Oct 2026
- Vinishma Technologies Private Limited vs. State Of KarnatakaKarnataka · 17 Oct 2026