WEST BENGAL INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LIMITED,KOLKATA vs. D.C.I.T., CIRCLE - 7(1), KOLKATA
आयकर अपीलȣय अͬधकरण, कोलकाता पीठ “ए’’, कोलकाता
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “A” BENCH: KOLKATA
Įी राजेश कुमार, लेखा सटèय एवं Įी Ĥदȣप कुमार चौबे, ÛयाǓयक सदèय के सम¢
[Before Shri Rajesh Kumar, Accountant Member &Shri Pradip Kumar Choubey, Judicial Member]
I.T.A. No. 2064/Kol/2024
Assessment Year: 2015-16
West Bengal Industrial
Development Corporation Ltd.
(PAN: AAACW 3043 Q)
Vs.
DCIT, Circle-7(1), Kolkata
Appellant /
)
अपीलाथȸ
(
Respondent / Ĥ×यथȸ
Date of Hearing / सुनवाई
कȧ Ǔतͬथ
16.12.2024
Date of Pronouncement/
आदेश उɮघोषणा कȧ Ǔतͬथ
17.01.2025
For the assessee /
Ǔनधा[ǐरती कȧ ओर से
Shri B. R. Dutta, FCA
For the revenue / राजèव
कȧ ओर से
Shri Subhendu Datta, CITDR
ORDER / आदेश
Per Pradip Kumar Choubey, JM:
This is the appeal preferred by the assessee against order of Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeal)-NFAC, Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Ld. CIT(A)] dated
09.08.2024 for AY 2015-16. 2
I.T.A. No. 2064/Kol/2024
Assessment Year: 2015-16
West Bengal Industrial Development Corporation Ltd.
Brief facts of the case of the assessee is that the assessee being a company filed its return of income for AY 2015-16 declaring total income of Rs. 18,98,37,730/- with deemed total income u/s 115JB of the Act of Rs. 25,34,54,750/-. The case of the assessee was selected for scrutiny and notices u/s 143(2) and 142(1) of the Act were issued. The case was discussed with the Ld. A.R and after that the AO added an amount of Rs. 7,81,40,620/- treated as an income of the assessee as the same was received from the State Government by way of grant. The AO has further disallowed the deduction claimed u/s 36(1)(viia) and 36(1)(vii) an amount of Rs. 1,87,66,374/- and assessed the total income of Rs. 28,64,44,724/-. 3. The said order has been challenged by the assessee before the Ld. CIT(A) wherein the appeal of the assessee has been partly allowed as the Ld. CIT(A) has allowed the appeal of the assessee on the issue of nature of the grant but dismissed the claim of deduction u/s 36(1)(viia) and 36(1)(vii) of the Act an amount of Rs. 1,87,66,374/-.
Being aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned order, the assessee has preferred the present appeal.
4. The ld. Counsel appeared on behalf of the assessee has submitted that the AO as well as the Ld. CIT(A) did wrong in denying the claim of deduction u/s 36(1)(viia) and 36(1)(vii) in spite of fact that the assessee company a public company entitled to claim deduction. The Ld. Counsel further submits that the main object of the company is to advance loans and participate in the share capital of the companies to be established for industrial development and generation of employment in the State. The Ld. Counsel further submits that deduction claimed u/s 36(1)(viia) and 36(1)(vii) of the Act have already been accepted by the department consistently over the AY 2010-11 to 2014-15. He has brought the assessment order for AY 2010-11 and 2014-15 before us. The Ld.
Counsel has also filed general Circular No. 10/2012 issued by Government of India,
Ministry of Corporate Affairs and subject matter was for declaring financial institution as a public financial institution u/s 4A of the Companies Act, 1956. The Ld. Counsel
I.T.A. No. 2064/Kol/2024
Assessment Year: 2015-16
West Bengal Industrial Development Corporation Ltd.
further submits that the assessee company is recorded public financial institution. Since it specifies the guidelines framed by the Ministry of Corporate Affairs, hence the company is entitled to claim deduction u/s 36(1)(viia) and 36(1)(vii) of the Act.
5. Contrary to that, the Ld. D.R supports the impugned order.
6. We have perused the order of the AO as well as Ld. CIT(A). The AO has assessed the total income of the assessee at Rs. 28,67,44,724/- by adding income received by the assessee between grant from the State Government and also after disallowing claimed deduction u/s 36(1)(viia) and 36(1)(vii) of the Act. The Ld. CIT(A) has allowed the appeal of the assessee on the issue of grant received but dismissed the claim of deduction u/s 36(1)(viia) and 36(1)(vii) of the Act. We have gone through the order passed by the AO against the same issue for AY 2010-11 up to AY 2014-15 and find that the deduction with respect to claim u/s 36(1)(viia) and 36(1)(vii) of the Act has consistently be accepted by the department. We have also gone through the general circular no. 10/2012 filed by the assessee and the circular is as follows:
I.T.A. No. 2064/Kol/2024
Assessment Year: 2015-16
West Bengal Industrial Development Corporation Ltd.
I.T.A. No. 2064/Kol/2024
Assessment Year: 2015-16
West Bengal Industrial Development Corporation Ltd.
Going over the facts of the case, we find that West Bengal Industrial Development Corporation Ltd (WBIDCL) formed in 1967 under the Companies Act is the premier nodal agency of West Bengal Industry, WBIDC provides support to industry through facilitation, financing, operationalizing, incentive policy and setting of the industrial part. The object clause of the memorandum of Article of Association has also been brought before us that goes to show that WBIDC is engaged in advancing loans and participating in the share capital of the companies, firm and association involved in Industries to be established within the State in order to secure and assist in the expeditious and orderly establishment the growth and development of industries in the State of West Bengal. We further find that WBIDC is regarded a public financial institution as it satisfies the guidelines framed by the Ministry of Company Affairs for declaring financing institution u/s 4A of the Act,1956. We further find that WBIDC has advanced long term loans of expenditure of Rs. 3,09,47,61,000/- till 31.03.2015 for AY 2015-16 and interest earned on long term finance (loans) during the year ended 31.03.2015 amounting to Rs. 6,93,46,000/- has been duly offered to tax. It is further pertinent to mention herein that specified entity as defined in Explanation (a)(i) & (ii) to Section 36(1)(viii) meaning a financial corporation specified in Section 4A of the Companies Act, 1956 and WBIDC satisfies this criterion as we have already discussed in the preceding paragraph that the object clause of memorandum of article of association established that WBIDC is engaged in advancing loans and participating in the share capital of the companies, firms and association involved in the industries to be established within the state in order to secure and assist in the expeditious and orderly establishment, growth and development of industries in the State of West Bengal. The said section has been accepted by the Department consistently. Keeping in view, the above discussion, we find substance in the argument of Ld. Counsel for the assessee that disallowance of claim of deduction u/s 36(1)(viia) and 36(1)(vii) is erroneous and hence liable to be deleted. 8. The next issue raised by the Ld. A.R with regard to tax credit and submit that the necessary direction for giving credit for the same. We find that there is no adjudication
I.T.A. No. 2064/Kol/2024
Assessment Year: 2015-16
West Bengal Industrial Development Corporation Ltd.
neither by the AO nor by the Ld. CIT(A) on this issue. Hence, we are not inclined to pass any order in this context.
In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed.
Order is pronounced in the open court on 17th January, 2025 (Rajesh Kumar/राजेश कुमार) (Pradip Kumar Choubey /Ĥदȣप कुमार चौबे)
Accountant Member/लेखा सदèय Judicial Member/ÛयाǓयक सदèय
Dated: 17th January, 2025
SM, Sr. PS
Copy of the order forwarded to:
Appellant- West Bengal Industrial Development Corporation ltd., Protiti, 23, Abanindranath Thakur Sarani (Camac Street), Kolkata-700017. 2. Respondent – DCIT, Circle-7(1), Kolkata 3. Ld. CIT(A)-NFAC, Delhi 4. Ld. Pr. CIT- , Kolkata 5. DR, Kolkata Benches, Kolkata (sent through e-mail)By Order