← Back to search

PASSION BEVERAGES PVT. LTD.,HOOGHLY vs. ITO, NFAC, , DELHI

PDF
ITA 760/KOL/2024[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata25 February 20252 pages

Before: SHRI GEORGE MATHAN & SHRI RAKESH MISHRA

For Appellant: N o n e
For Respondent: Shri Praveen Kishore, CIT, DR
Hearing: 25.02.2025Pronounced: 25.02.2025

Per Bench : These are two appeals filed by the assessee against the separate orders of the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi [hereinafter referred to as “the Ld. CIT(A)”] vide order nos. ITBA/NFAC /S/250/2023-24/1060727007(1) & ITBA/NFAC/ S/250/2023-24/1060726680(1) dated 09.02.2024 passed u/s. 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act”) for AYs 2015-16 and 2016-17. 2. None appeared on behalf of the assessee and Shri Praveen Kishore, CIT, DR appeared on behalf of the revenue. 3. The appeals have been filed by the assessee by hand on 09.04.2024. The first date of hearing has been intimated as 03.07.2024. The appeals have been posted for hearing on multiple times being 03.07.2024, Passion Beverages P. ltd., AYs: 2015-16 & 2016-17

23.

09.2024, 23.12.2024 and today being 25.02.2025. None appeared to represent these appeals on any of these dates. This clearly shows the lackadaisical attitude/approach of the assessee in so far as even before the Ld. CIT(A) though multiple opportunities have been granted, the assessee chose not to represent. However, after receipt of the order of the Ld. CIT(A) the assessee has found it within itself to file this appeal before the Tribunal within time. This is admittedly nothing but delaying tactics which is being followed by the assessee. Keeping this in mind and also treating this attitude against the principles of natural justice, we are of the view that assessee should be granted one more opportunity. This being so, the issues in these appeals are restored to the file of the Ld. CIT(A) subject to the assessee paying a cost of Rs.10,000/- per appeals to the department within sixty days from the date of this order. Should the assessee not pay the abovementioned cost of Rs. 10,000/- per appeal within the prescribed period of sixty days from the date of this order, the order of the Ld. CIT(A) shall stand confirmed. 4. In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purpose subject to above directions. Order pronounced in the open court. (Rakesh Mishra) Judicial Member Dated: 25th February, 2025 JD, Sr. P.S. Copy to: 1. The Appellant: Passion Beverages Pvt. Ltd. 2. The Respondent. Assessing Officer, NFAC, Delhi 3. CIT(A), NFAC, Delhi 4. Pr. CIT 5. DR, ITAT, Kolkata Bench, KolkataBy Order

PASSION BEVERAGES PVT. LTD.,HOOGHLY vs ITO, NFAC, , DELHI | BharatTax