JAN SEVA TRUST,KOLKATA vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, EXEMPTION, KOLKATA, KOLKATA
In favour of the assessee: the assessee's appeal was allowed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal found that the assessee was not given an opportunity to be heard. Therefore, the Tribunal restored the case to the file of the CIT(E) for fresh adjudication, directing the assessee to submit all documentary evidence.
What were the facts?
The assessee, Jan Seva Trust, filed an application for registration under Section 12A(1)(AC)(iii) of the Act. The CIT(E) rejected the application in limine without providing an opportunity for the assessee to present its case or evidence. The assessee appealed this decision.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(E) erred in rejecting the assessee's application for registration without providing an opportunity of being heard.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “A” BENCH: KOLKATA
Before: Shri Rajesh Kumar&Shri Pradip Kumar Choubey]
ORDER / आदेश Per Pradip Kumar Choubey, JM: This is the appeal preferred by the assessee against order of Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption)-Kolkata (hereinafter referred to as the Ld. CIT(E)] dated 09.09.2024 for AY 2025-26.
The Ld. Counsel of the assessee has challenged the impugned order of the Ld. CIT(A) only on this ground that the Ld. CIT(A) has rejected the application of the assessee which has been filed for registration u/s 12A(1)(AC)(iii) of the Act in limine Assessment Year: 2025-26 Jan Seva Trust without giving an opportunity to the assessee. The Ld. Counsel for the assessee submits that the assessee is a trust and it has filed application I Form no. 10AD for registration but his application has been rejected by the Ld. CIT(A) as there was no reply and responses from the assessee. The prayer of the ld. Counsel for the assessee is that the assessee has to be given an opportunity to place all the documentary evidences before the Ld. CIT(E ).
Contrary to that the Ld. D.R though supports the impugned order of the Ld. CIT(A) but did not raise any objection in restoring the case before the Ld. CIT(E).
Going over the facts of the case, we find that the assessee filed an application on 30.03.2024 in Form 10AD for registration us/ 12A(1)(AC)(iii) of the Act but since there was no compliance on behalf of the assessee. The Ld. CIT(E) has rejected the application in limine. Going over the facts of the case, we are inclined to give an opportunity to the assessee to place its case before the Ld. CIT(E). Accordingly, the case of the assessee is hereby restored into the file of Ld. CIT(E) for fresh adjudication. The assessee is directed to place all the documentary evidences before the Ld. CIT(E).
In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes.
Order is pronounced in the open court on 25th February, 2025
Sd/- Sd/- (Rajesh Kumar/राजेश कुमार) (Pradip Kumar Choubey /�द�प कुमार चौबे) Accountant Member/लेखा सद�य Judicial Member/�या�यक सद�य Dated: 25th February, 2025 SM, Sr. PS Copy of the order forwarded to: 1. Appellant- Jan Seva Trust, C/o, Tejmohan Singh, Advocate, #527, Sector 10-D, Chandigarh-160011 2. Respondent – CIT(E), Kolkata 3. Ld. Pr. CIT- , Kolkata 4. DR, Kolkata Benches, Kolkata (sent through e-mail)
More judgments on Section 12A(1)(AC)(iii)
- Desire Foundation, Jaipur vs Income Tax Officer, JaipurITA 1646/JPR/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Sevasetu Foundation, Vadodara vs Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption)…ITA 3149/AHD/2026[NA]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026
- Sevasetu Foundation, Vadodara vs Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption)…ITA 3148/AHD/2026[NA]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026
- Sanskardham Nandan, Mehsana vs CIT(Exemption), AhmedabadITA 2980/AHD/2026[2025-26]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2025-26
- D vs Welfare Foundation, Thanevs.Income Tax…ITA 6191/MUM/2026[2025-26]Status: Disposed12 Oct 2026AY 2025-26
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Sushama Mishra vs. The Commissioner Of CT And GST, Odisha, KatakOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- Saudamini Samantray vs. Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, CT And GST, Bhubaneswar IiOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S. Keshav Rice Mill, Ganjam vs. Chief Commissioner, CT And GST, Odisha, KatakaOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S. Nanda Contruction PVT. LTD., Angul vs. Additional Commissioner, GST And Central Excise Commissionerate, SundergarhOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Utkal Suppliers,Ganjam vs. Assistant Commissioner Of CT And GST, Ganjam-I Circle,GanjamOrissa · 28 Oct 2026