← Back to search

RAJ KUMAR BOTHRA,KOLKATA vs. ITO, WARD-37(3), KOLKATA

PDF
ITA 2349/KOL/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata26 February 20252 pages

Aआयकर अपीलȣय अͬधकरण, कोलकाता पीठ “बी’’, कोलकाता
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “B” BENCH: KOLKATA
Įी राजेश कुमार, लेखा सटèय एवं Įी Ĥदȣप कुमार चौबे, ÛयाǓयक सदèय के सम¢
[Before Shri Rajesh Kumar,Accountant Member & Shri Pradip Kumar Choubey, Judicial Member]
I.T.A. No. 2349/Kol/2024
Assessment Year: 2018-19

Raj Kumar Bothra

(PAN: AEBPB 2819 H)
Vs.
ITO, Ward-37(3), Kolkata
Appellant /

)
अपीलाथȸ
(

Respondent / Ĥ×यथȸ

Date of Hearing / सुनवाई
कȧ Ǔतͬथ
19.02.2025
Date of Pronouncement/
आदेश उɮघोषणा कȧ Ǔतͬथ
26.02.2025
For the assessee /
Ǔनधा[ǐरती कȧ ओर से
Shri Anil Kumar Kochar, A.R

For the revenue / राजèव
कȧ ओर से
Shri Sailen Samadder, Addl. CIT Sr. D.R

ORDER / आदेश

Per Pradip Kumar Choubey, JM:

This is the appeal preferred by the assessee against the order of Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeal)-Addl/JCIT(A)-2, Ludhiana (hereinafter referred to as the Ld.
CIT(A)] dated 21.10.2024 for AY 2018-19. 2

I.T.A. No. 2349/Kol/2024
Assessment Year: 2018-19
Raj Kumar Bothra

2.

At the time of hearing, it came to our notice that the assessee has already gone into Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme 2024 ('VSVS 2024' Scheme) and he received Form 2 with the competent authority but there was certain error in issuing Form 2. Assessee orally prayed before the Bench that the assessee may be allowed to withdraw this appeal to which the ld. DR did not oppose. 3. Hence, we are dismissing the appeal as withdrawn with the liberty to the assessee to get the appeal revived by filing necessary miscellaneous application if the assessee is not successful in the VSVS-24, for any reason, whatsoever. In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.

Order is pronounced in the open court on 26th February, 2025 (Rajesh Kumar /राजेश कुमार) (Pradip Kumar Choubey /Ĥदȣप कुमार चौबे)
Accountant Member/लेखा सदèय Judicial Member/ÛयाǓयक सदèय

Dated: 26th February, 2025

SM, Sr. PS

Copy of the order forwarded to:

1.

Appellant- Raj Kumar Bothra, 26, Sashi Sadan, P. K. Tagore Street, Beadon Street, Kolkata-700006 2. Respondent – ITO, Ward-37(3), Kolkata 3. Ld. CIT(A)-Addl/JCIT(A)-2, Ludhiana 4. Ld. Pr. CIT- , Kolkata 5. DR, Kolkata Benches, Kolkata (sent through e-mail)By Order

RAJ KUMAR BOTHRA,KOLKATA vs ITO, WARD-37(3), KOLKATA | BharatTax