ROOMLE DAS,KOLKATA vs. I.T.O., WARD - 50(4), , KOLKATA

The present appeal filed by the assessee for the assessment year 2017-18 against the order dated 18.06.2024 of the National Faceless Appeal Centre [hereinafter referred to as ‘CIT(A)’] u/s 250 of the Income Tax Act (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Act’).

At the outset, the ld. counsel for the assessee submitted that the case of the assessee could not be represented before the Assessing Officer due to certain reasons which were beyond the control of the assessee and therefore, the assessment was framed by the Assessing Officer u/s 144 vide order dated 24.12.2019. The ld. counsel further submitted that even the penalty was imposed by the Assessing Officer of Rs.10,000/- u/s 272A(1)(d) of the Act vide order dated 30.12.2021 which was deleted by the Tribunal on the ground that there was sufficient cause for non- compliance to the said notice as the reasons were beyond the control of the assessee. The ld. AR further submitted that before the ld. CIT(A), the Assessment Year: 2017-18 Roomle Das assessee uploaded all the detailed submissions on the portal on various dates and produced before the Bench, the e-Proceedings Response Acknowledgement sheet which confirmed the said fact. The ld. AR further submitted that the ld. CIT(A) has passed the impugned ex parte order without taking into consideration the submissions of the assessee as evidenced by the e-proceedings Response Acknowledgement during the appellate proceedings. The ld. AR, therefore, prayed in the interest of natural justice and fair play that the appeal of the assessee may be restored to the file of the Assessing Officer so that the case may be decided on merit after affording reasonable opportunity of hearing to the assessee.

The ld. DR, on the other hand, left the issue to the wisdom of the Bench.