← Back to search

KOSC INDUSTRIES PVT. LTD.,KOLKATA vs. I.T.O., CIRCLE - 4(1), KOLKATA, KOLKATA

PDF
ITA 1190/KOL/2024[2016-2017]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata12 March 20252 pages

Before: SHRI RAJESH KUMAR, AM & SHRI PRADIP KUMAR CHOUBEY, JM

For Appellant: Shri Miraj D Shah, AR
For Respondent: Shri Kapil Mondal, DR
Hearing: 03.03.2025Pronounced: 12.03.2025

Per Rajesh Kumar, AM: These are appeals preferred by the assessee against the order of the National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the “Ld. CIT(A)”] dated 15.05.2024 & 30.04.2024 for the AYs 2016-17 & 2017-18. 02. At the outset, the ld. Counsel for the assessee pointed out that the appeal before the first appellate authority could not be attended by filing any written submissions on either of the dates i.e., on 15.06.2023, 09.04.2024 and 18.04.2024, because the notices issued by the ld. CIT (A) were not served upon the assessee. The ld. AR therefore, prayed that in the interest of justice and fair play and to meet the ends of justice, it would be reasonable and fair, if assessee is given one more opportunity to present his case on merit before the ld. CIT (A) so that the case could be decided on merit. ITA Nos. 1190 & 1191/KOL/2024 KOSC Industries Pvt. Ltd; A.Y. 2016-17 & 2017-18

03.

The ld. DR on the other hand, did not raise any objection and fairly agreed that the proceedings were an ex-parte before the ld. CIT (A) when the assessee failed to make any submission or arguments on merit. 04. After hearing the rival contentions and perusing the materials available on record, we find that the assessee is not represented in the appellate proceedings when the notices issued by the First Appellate Authority were not served upon the assessee. Under these circumstances, we are inclined to restore the appeal before the ld. CIT (A) with a direction to decide the same on merit after affording reasonable opportunity of hearing to the assessee. Consequently, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes. 05. In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes. Order pronounced in the open court on 12.03.2025. (PRADIP KUMAR CHOUBEY) (RAJESH KUMAR) (JUDICIAL MEMBER) (ACCOUNTANT MEMBER)

Kolkata, Dated: 12.03.2025
Sudip Sarkar, Sr.PS
Copy of the Order forwarded to :

1.

The Appellant 2. The Respondent 3. CIT 4. DR, ITAT, 5. Guard file. BY ORDER,

Sr. Private Secretary/ Asst.

KOSC INDUSTRIES PVT. LTD.,KOLKATA vs I.T.O., CIRCLE - 4(1), KOLKATA, KOLKATA | BharatTax