KISHORE TRADING COMPANY,KOLKATA vs. I.T.O., WARD - 36(1), KOLKATA, KOLKATA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal issued a corrigendum to rectify the error. The correct PAN number should be read as AADFK5925F, replacing the previously mentioned AADFK9525F, and this corrigendum will be part of the original order.
What were the facts?
A typographical error occurred in the PAN number of the assessee (AADFK9525F instead of AADFK5925F) in the Tribunal's order dated 08.01.2025 for ITA No. 1500/Kol/2024.
What were the issues?
Correction of a typographical error in the PAN number mentioned in a previous tribunal order.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
order passed by this Tribunal dated 08.01.2025 vide as AADFK9525F instead of AADFK5925F. Necessary corrigendum, in this respect, is issued as under:
Corrigendum “Correct PAN Number be read as “AADFK5925F” instead of “AADFK9525F”.
This corrigendum will form part of the order in dated 08.01.2025. (Corrigendum) Kishore Trading Company Kolkata, the 26th March, 2025.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Kotdwar Steel Limited vs. Office Of Hte Deputy CommissionerUttarakhand · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Kotdwar Steel Limited vs. Office Of The Deputy CommissionerUttarakhand · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Kotdwar Steel Limited vs. Office Of The Deputy CommissionerUttarakhand · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Govindjee Dairy Milk Private Limited vs. Central Goods And Services TaxRajasthan · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Asian Aura vs. Government Of Nct Of Delhi And Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026