A T AND S INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED,NANJAGUD,MYSORE vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,KOLKATA -2, KOLKATA
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The tribunal accepted the assessee's request for withdrawal. Since the Ld. Assessing Officer had already granted the due relief to the appellant, the tribunal dismissed the appeal as withdrawn.
What were the facts?
The assessee, AT & S India Pvt. Ltd., filed an appeal against an order passed by the PCIT under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act for AY 2017-18. During the hearing, the assessee requested to withdraw the appeal because the Assessing Officer had already granted the requested relief by computing book profit under Section 115JB in an order passed under Section 143(3) read with Section 263, making further pursuit of the appeal unnecessary.
What were the issues?
Whether an appeal against a Section 263 order should be dismissed as withdrawn when the Assessing Officer has subsequently granted the assessee the relief sought in a fresh assessment order.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “B” BENCH: KOLKATA
Before: Shri Rajesh Kumar&Shri Pradip Kumar Choubey]
ORDER / आदेश Per Pradip Kumar Choubey, JM: This is the appeal preferred by the assessee against order of Principal Commissioner of Income Tax -Kolkata-2, Kolkata (hereinafter referred to as the Ld. PCIT] passed u/s 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) dated 31.03.2024 for AY 2017-18.
Assessment Year: 2017-18 AT & S India pvt. Ltd. 2. At the time of hearing, the ld. Counsel for the assessee has submitted a letter dated 25.02.2025 requesting the Bench to allow the withdrawal the appeal. The operative portion is reproduced herein below:
Your goodself may kindly note that, in compliance with the above direction of the ld. PCIT the Ld. Assessing officer vide order issued under Section 143(3) r.w.s 263 of the Act dated 17.02.2025 has computed the Book profit of appellant under Section 115JB of the Act amounting to Rs. 43,22,95,288/-, which has also been computed by appellant in its return of income for the relevant year and thereby, the Ld. Assessing Officer has allowed the aforesaid claim of appellant. Copy of the order issued under Section 143(3) r.w.s 263 of the Act dated 17.02.2025 is enclosed as Annexure-1. In view of the above, appellant is not willing to pursue the captioned appeal, since the Ld. Assessing Officer has granted due relief to appellant.
Accordingly accepting the request of the assesse, we dismiss the appeal as withdrawn.
In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.
Order is pronounced in the open court on 25th March, 2025 Sd/- Sd/- (Rajesh Kumar/राजेश कुमार) (Pradip Kumar Choubey /�द�प कुमार चौबे) Accountant Member/लेखा सद�य Judicial Member/�या�यक सद�य Dated: 25th March, 2025 SM, Sr. PS Copy of the order forwarded to: 1. Appellant- AT & S India Pvt. Ltd. ,12A, Industrial Area, Nanjagud H.O. Karnataka-571301 2. Respondent – PCIT, Kolkata-2, Kolkata 3. DR, Kolkata Benches, Kolkata (sent through e-mail)
More judgments on Section 263
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Neo Structo Construction P. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The Pr. CIT- 3, AhmedabadITA 1216/AHD/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- Vimal Harilal Baldania, Gandhidham vs The ITO Ward 2, GandhidhamITA 770/RJT/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1493/KOL/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1492/KOL/2026[2013-2014]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2013-2014
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Shining Steel Through Its Proprietor Kartik Gupta vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Redamancy World Through Its Proprietor Sanjay Kumar Goel vs. Central Board Of Indirect Taxes And Customs & Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Arj Exim INDIA vs. Additional Commissioner Of CGST, Appeals-Ii, New Delhi And OrsDelhi · 27 Oct 2026
- The State Of Bihar Through The Commissioner Of State Tax vs. Kaushlendra KumarPatna · 27 Oct 2026
- Ayush Sureshchandra Shah vs. State Of GujaratGujarat · 27 Oct 2026