M/S. DHANKAMAL PROPERTIES PRIVATE LIMITED,KOLKATA vs. ITO, WARD - 1(1), KOLKATA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal, in the interest of justice, restored the matter to the Ld. CIT(A) for fresh adjudication. This remand is conditional on the assessee paying a cost of Rs. 50,000/- to Legal Aid Services within sixty days. Failure to provide proof of payment at the first hearing or pay the costs within the stipulated period will result in the confirmation of the Ld. CIT(A)'s original order.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against the CIT(A)'s order for the assessment year 2012-13, but failed to appear for the hearing before the Tribunal. The Ld. CIT(A) had noted the assessee's non-cooperation in the prior appellate proceedings. The Sr. DR contended that remanding the case would grant the assessee an undeserved second opportunity.
What were the issues?
The key issue was whether to remand the case to the CIT(A) for fresh adjudication, considering the assessee's lack of cooperation in prior proceedings, and if so, under what conditions should such a remand be granted.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “B” BENCH, KOLKATA
Before: SHRI GEORGE MATHAN & SHRI SANJAY AWASTHI
O R D E R
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S. Mehra Mac Industries Private Limited vs. The Deputy State Tax OfficerTelangana · 30 Oct 2026
- Santosh Das And Anr. vs. Union Of INDIACalcutta · 30 Oct 2026
- M/S Rama Krishna Industries vs. State Of Hp And OthersHimachal Pradesh · 30 Oct 2026
- Smt Usha W/O Shri Tarun vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S Maruti Nandan Minetech Private Limited vs. The Joint CommissionerRajasthan · 29 Oct 2026
