RED SIENNA EDUCATIONAL SERVICES ,DELHI vs. CIT EXEMPTION, DELHI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal found prima facie merit in the assessees' arguments, noting that the CIT(E)'s orders did not appear to have considered the relevant factual matrix. Therefore, the Tribunal restored the appeals back to the CIT(E) for fresh adjudication.
What were the facts?
Two assessees, M/s Red Sienna Educational Services and M/s Rosella Educational Foundation, filed appeals against the CIT(E)'s orders denying them registration under section 12AB(1) and section 80G. The appeals were related to denial of these registrations.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(E) properly considered the evidence and factual matrix before denying registration under sections 12AB and 80G to the assessees.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH ‘F’, NEW DELHI
Before: Sh. Satbeer Singh Godara&
Heard together (4 matters)
Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.
ORDER Per Bench: Both these assessees i.e. M/s Red Sienna Educational Services and M/s Rosella Educational Foundation, had filed their instant twin appeals each to 3818/Del/2024; respectively. All other relevant details thereof stand tabulated as under:
Respondent Order passed against Proceedings No. u/s 1. 3815/Del/2024 Red Sienna CIT(E) CIT(E), Delhi, 12AB Educational DIN & order No. Services ITBA/EXM/F/EXM45/ 2024-25/1065862230(1) Dated 20.06.2024 2. 3818/Del/2024 Red Sienna CIT(E) CIT(E), Delhi, 80G Educational DIN & order No. Services ITBA/EXM/F/EXM45/ 2024-25/1065862319(1) Dated 20.06.2024 3. 3816/Del/2024 Rosella CIT(E) CIT(E), Delhi, 12AB Educational DIN & order No. Foundation ITBA/EXM/F/EXM45/ 2024-25/1066156021(1) Dated 27.06.2024 4. 3817/Del/2024 Rosella CIT(E) CIT(E), Delhi, 80G Educational DIN & order No. Foundation ITBA/EXM/F/EXM45/ 2024-25/1066156044(1) Dated 27.06.2024
Heard both these assessees as well as the department through their learned representatives. Case files perused.
It emerges during the course of hearing that both these assessees are identically aggrieved by the learned CIT(E)’s respective orders denying them section 12AB(1) as well as section 80G registration(s) which form sole subject matter of adjudication before us.
Learned counsel invites our attention to the CIT(E) impugned orders rejecting section 12AB registration(s) and & 3818/Del/2024 Red Sienna Educational Services & 3817/Del/2024 Rosella Educational Foundation submits that he has not considered the corresponding detailed evidence in support of their charitable objects as well as the consequential activities carried out which was submitted in detail, in the lower proceedings. Our attention is further invited to the assessees’ identical pleadings that all the afore-stated material duly form part of records in the lower proceedings.
The Revenue draws strong support from the learned CIT(E) impugned respective findings declining both these assessees’ section 12AB as well as section 80G registration(s).
Be that as it may, we are prima facie find merit in the assessees arguments at this stage as it’s very much evident that learned CIT(E) impugned order(s) have not been passed after dealing with the relevant factual matrix as indicated by the learned counsel. We thus deem it appropriate in the larger interest of justice to restore these twin assessee’s instant four appeals back to the CIT(E) for his afresh appropriate adjudication as per law preferably within three effective opportunities subject to a rider that the assessees shall plead and prove these case(s) at their own risk and responsibility, in consequential proceedings. Ordered accordingly.
These twin assessee’s four appeals i.e. to 3818/Del/2024 are allowed for statistical purposes in above terms. A copy of this common order be placed in the respective case files. Order Pronounced in the Open Court on 21/03/2025.
More judgments on Section 12AB
- Desire Foundation, Jaipur vs Income Tax Officer, JaipurITA 1646/JPR/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Sheo Narayan Trust, Khajpura vs CIT Exemption, PatnaITA 554/PAT/2026[2025-2026]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2025-2026
- Ss Early Learning Society, Hyderabad vs CIT (Exemption), HyderabadITA 1208/HYD/2025[2026-27]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
- Shri Brajshiromani Laxmandas Sewa Trust… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward 1(3)(1), Mathura…ITA 592/AGR/2026[2026-2027]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2026-2027
- Shri Brajshiromani Laxmandas Sewa Trust… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward 1(3)(1), Mathura…ITA 591/AGR/2026[2026-2027]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2026-2027
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Jharkhand Contractors Association Thro Its President- Pramod Kumar vs. Bharat Coking Coal LTD. Thro Its Chairman Cum Managing DirectorJharkhand · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Isc Processors Private Limited vs. Superintendent,Range-Iv, Burrabazar Div, CGST And Cx, Kolkata (N) Commissionerate And AnrCalcutta · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Raashi Constructions vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of Commercial TaxesKarnataka · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Bidasaria Fenster Solutions vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 13 Oct 2026
- Amit Agency vs. Commissioner, CGST And CxPatna · 13 Oct 2026