INCOME TAX OFFICER, JIND vs KULBHUSHAN KANSAL, NARWANA

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH “C”, NEW DELHI

Before: SHRI SHAMIM YAHYA, & SHRI VIMAL KUMARA.YR. : 2015-16

For Appellant: Shri B.K. Anand, CA

For Respondent: Shri Om Parkash, Sr. DR

Hearing: 24.03.2025Pronounced: 24.03.2025

PER SHAMIM YAHYA, AM :

The Revenue has filed the Appeal against the Order of the Ld. CIT(A),
Jind,
Haryana, dated
29.08.2024, relating to assessment year
2015-16. 2. On perusal of the records, it transpires that the tax effect involved in this appeal is below the prescribed limit of Rs. 60 lacs, as stipulated in CBDT Circular
No.09/2024 dated 17.09.2024 in filing the appeal before the Tribunal, for which Ld. DR fairly agreed.
3. Keeping in view of the aforesaid factual matrix, we deem it fit and proper to dismiss the appeal of the Revenue in the light of the aforesaid Circular

2
No.09/2024 of the CBDT dated 17.09.2024, as not maintainable. Resultantly, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed.
Order pronounced in the Open Court on 24.03.2025. (VIMAL KUMAR) (SHAMIM YAHYA)
JUDICIAL MEMBER
ACCOUNTANT MEMBER

SRBHATNAGAR

INCOME TAX OFFICER, JIND vs. KULBHUSHAN KANSAL, NARWANA