Loading judgment…
Facts
The Revenue filed an appeal against the order of the Ld. CIT(A), Jind, Haryana, dated 29.08.2024, concerning the assessment year 2015-16.
Held
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeal because the tax effect involved was below the prescribed limit of Rs. 60 lacs, as per CBDT Circular No. 09/2024 dated 17.09.2024, rendering the appeal non-maintainable.
Key Issues
Whether the Revenue's appeal was maintainable before the Tribunal, given that the tax effect involved was below the threshold prescribed by CBDT Circular No. 09/2024.
Sections Cited
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH “C”, NEW DELHI
A.YR. : 2015-16 INCOME TAX OFFICER, JIND, KULBHUSHAN KANSAL, 1234, URBAN ESTATE, SECTOR-10, VS. 106, MODEL TOWN, JIND, HARYANA NARWANA, JIND, HARYANA (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) Appellant by : Shri B.K. Anand, CA Respondent by : Shri Om Parkash, Sr. DR Date of hearing : 24.03.2025 Date of pronouncement : 24.03.2025 ORDER
PER SHAMIM YAHYA, AM :
The Revenue has filed the Appeal against the Order of the Ld. CIT(A), Jind, Haryana, dated 29.08.2024, relating to assessment year 2015-16.
On perusal of the records, it transpires that the tax effect involved in this appeal is below the prescribed limit of Rs. 60 lacs, as stipulated in CBDT Circular No.09/2024 dated 17.09.2024 in filing the appeal before the Tribunal, for which Ld. DR fairly agreed.
Keeping in view of the aforesaid factual matrix, we deem it fit and proper to dismiss the appeal of the Revenue in the light of the aforesaid Circular No.09/2024 of the CBDT dated 17.09.2024, as not maintainable. Resultantly, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed. Order pronounced in the Open Court on 24.03.2025.