Loading judgment…
No AI summary yet for this case.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, HYDERABAD BENCH “B-SMC”, HYDERABAD
Before: SHRI J. SUDHAKAR REDDY
THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL HYDERABAD BENCH “B-SMC”, HYDERABAD BEFORE SHRI J. SUDHAKAR REDDY, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA No. 1118/Hyd/2017 Assessment Year: 2010-11 Jhansi Lakshmi Bai Mahila vs. ITO (Exemptions) Mandali, Ward-2, Hyderabad. Hyderabad. PAN- AAATJ3835E (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee by : Shri Md. Afzal Revenue by : Shri K. Gopala Krishna Date of hearing : 09-05-2018 Date of pronouncement : 09-05-2018 ORDER PER SHRI J. SUDHAKAR REDDY, AM: This appeal is filed by the assessee directed against the order of the Ld. CIT(A)-9, Hyderabad, dated 28.03.2017 for the A.Y 2010-11 passed u/s 250 of the IT Act, 1961 (the Act).
After hearing rival contentions, I find that the Ld. CIT(A) has passed an ex-parte order, as the assessee has fail to appear before him in response to the notices. The assessee convinced me that it has been prevented by sufficient cause for appearing before the Ld. First appellate authority. Hence in the interest of natural justice I set aside
2 ITA No. 1118/Hyd/2017 Jhansi Lakshmi Bai Mahila Mandali, Hyderabad.. this appeal to the file of the Ld. First appellate authority for fresh adjudication in accordance with law.
In the result this appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes.
Pronounced in the open court on 09th May, 2018.
Sd/- (J. SUDHAKAR REDDY) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER
Hyderabad, Dated: 09th May, 2018. KRK 1) Jhansi Lakshmi Bai Mahila Mandali, C/o Md. Afzal, Adv, 11-5-465, Sherson’s Residency, Flat No. 402, Criminal Court Road, Red Hills, Hyderabad-04. 2) The ITO (Exemption), Ward-2, Hyderabad. 3) CIT(A) -9, Hyderabad. 4) The Addl.CIT (Exemptions) Hyderabad. 5) The Departmental Representative, I.T.A.T., Hyderabad. 6) Guard File