INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD -4, AGARTALA, AGARTALA vs. SHRI SANTOSH CHANDRA SAHA, AGARTALA

PDF · subscribers
ITA 279/GTY/2013Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati14 August 2018AY 2006-073 pages

In favour of the assessee: the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.

AI SummaryDismissed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal held that the appeals were not maintainable in light of CBDT Circular No. 3/2018, which sets monetary limits for filing appeals. The Revenue is bound by its own circulars.

What were the facts?

The Revenue filed two appeals before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT). The tax effect in these appeals was less than Rs. 20 lakhs.

What were the issues?

Whether appeals filed by the Revenue with a tax effect below the prescribed monetary limit in a CBDT circular are maintainable before the Tribunal.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 147,Section 143(3),Section 144

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Cases cited in this judgment(1)Show list

Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, GUWAHATI BENCH: GUWAHATI

Before: Shri P.M.Jagtap, AM & Shri A. T. Varkey, JM]

Hearing: 17.08.2018Pronounced: 17.08.2018

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL GUWAHATI BENCH: GUWAHATI [Before Shri P.M.Jagtap, AM & Shri A. T. Varkey, JM] Sl. ITA No. & A.Y. Revenue/Rep. by Vs Assessee/PAN/Rep. by (As per power No. filed) (1) (2) (3) (4) 1. 279/Gau/2013 I.T.O., Ward-4, Agartala Shri Santosh Ch.Saha, C/o M/s Smart AY. 2006-07 Rep. by Shri. Sandeep Sakunatala Road, Agartala, Tripura (W) Sengupta, JCIT PAN: AMLPS 8651A, Rep. by Shri Sanjay Mody, FCA 2. 164/Gau/2016 ACIT, Circle-Tinsukia, Sri Kamakhya Borthakur, A.T.Road, AY. 2012-13 Tinsukia, Assam Rep. by Shri. P.O.Hijuguri, Tinsukia (Assam). Sandeep Sengupta, JCIT PAN : AEAPB3423Q Rep. by None

Date of hearing: 17.08.2018 Date of pronouncement: 17.08.2018

ORDER Per Bench:

These 2 appeals of the revenue arise out of the orders of the Learned CIT(A) against the orders of assessment framed u/s 147 / 143(3) / 144 etc. of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Act’).

2.

At the outset itself, the Ld. DR has brought to our attention to the fact that the revenue has preferred these aforesaid appeals which have tax effect of less than Rs. 20 lacs, therefore, the revenue does not intend to press the appeals in the light of the CBDT Circular No.3/2018 dated 11.07.2018 wherein CBDT has directed as under:

“3 . Henceforth, appeals/ SLPs shall not be filed in cases where the tax effect does not exceed the monetary limits given hereunder: Sl. No. Appeals/SLP’s in Income-tax matters Monetary Limit (in Rs) 1. Before Appellate Tribunal 20,00,000/- 2. Before High Court 50,00,000/- 3. Before Supreme Court 1,00,00,000/- It is clarified that an appeal should not be filed merely because the tax effect in a case exceeds the monetary limits prescribed above. Filing of appeal in such cases is to be decided on merits of the case. 4. For this purpose, 'tax effect' means the difference between the tax on the total income assessed and the tax that would have been chargeable had such total income been reduced by the amount of income in respect of the issues against which appeal is intended to be filed (hereinafter referred to as 'disputed issues’). Further, 'tax effect' shall be tax including applicable surcharge and cess. However, the tax will not include any interest thereon, except where chargeability of interest itself is in dispute. In case the chargeability of interest is the issue under dispute, the amount of interest shall be the tax effect. In cases where returned loss is reduced or assessed as income, the tax effect would include notional tax on disputed additions. In case of penalty orders, the tax effect will mean quantum of penalty deleted or reduced in the order to be appealed against.”

3.

In para-13 of the said circular it has further been clarified that the revised monetary limits will apply retrospectively. The relevant para-13 of the Circular reads thus: “13. This Circular will apply to SLPs/appeals/cross objections/references to be filed henceforth in SC/HCs/Tribunal and it shall also apply retrospectively to pending SLPs/appeals/cross objections/references. Pending appeals below the specified tax limits in para 3 above may be withdrawn/not pressed.

4.

In the present case, the tax effect in these appeals by the revenue is less than Rs.20,00,000/-. Though these appeals had been filed by the revenue on various dates and were within the monetary limit in the form of tax effect for filing appeals before Tribunal, in view of para-13 of the Circular of CBDT, even such appeals will be governed by the new monetary limits laid down in the CBDT Circular No.3/2018 referred to above. 5. It is a settled law that the Circulars issued by CBDT are binding on the Revenue. This position was confirmed by the Apex Court in the case of Commissioner of Customs vs Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. reported in 267 ITR 272 wherein their Lordships examined the earlier decisions of the Apex Court with regard to binding nature of the Circular and laid down that when a circular issued by the Board remains in operation then the Revenue is bound by it and cannot be allowed to plead that it is not valid or that it is contrary to the terms of the statute. 5.1. In the event, the Revenue finds at a later point of time that the tax effect in the appeal is more than Rs.20 lakhs or despite low tax effect the appeal of the revenue is maintainable, the revenue is at liberty to move this Tribunal for recalling of this order. 6. In view of the above, we hold that the appeals filed by the Department, against the impugned orders of the Ld. CIT(A), are contrary to the policy decision of the Department and as such the appeals filed by the Department are dismissed in limine. 7. In the result, the appeals by the Revenue are dismissed.

Order pronounced in the open court on 17.08.2018. Sd/- Sd/- (A.T.Varkey) (P.M.Jagtap) Judicial Member Accountant Member Dated : 17th August, 2018

RG. Sr. P.S 2

3 Copy of the order forwarded to:

1.

APPELLANT 2 Respondent 3. The CIT(A), Guwahati 4. CIT Guwahati 5. DR, Guwahati Bench, Guwahati. /True Copy, By order,

Sr.Private Secretary(on tour) ITAT, Guwahati Bench, Guwahati

More judgments on Section 147

All 49,210 judgments and leading authorities on Section 147 →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →