SRI. M. NARSING RAO,HYDERABAD vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-8(1), HYDERABAD
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal found that the CIT(A) passed an order before the adjourned date, violating principles of natural justice. Therefore, the matter was set aside for fresh adjudication.
What were the facts?
The assessee's appeal before the CIT(A) was decided ex-parte. The assessee had filed an adjournment petition before the CIT(A) to file additional grounds and written submissions.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(A) violated principles of natural justice by passing an ex-parte order without affording a proper opportunity of being heard to the assessee.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, HYDERABAD BENCH “B”, HYDERABAD
Before: SHRI J. SUDHAKAR REDDY & SMT. P. MADHAVI DEVI
PER J. SUDHAKAR REDDY, A.M.:
This is an appeal filed by the assessee directed against the order the Ld. CIT(A) - 2, Hyderabad, dated 27/06/2017 passed u/s 250 of the IT Act, 1961 (the Act), for AY 2013-14. 2. After hearing rival contentions, we find that the ld. CIT(A) has passed an ex-parte order. Shri A.V. Raghuram has produced before this Bench an adjournment petition filed by the assessee before the ld. CIT(A) – 2, Hyderabad on 10/07/2017, seeking time for filing additional ground for invoking the 2nd proviso to section 40(a)(ia) of the Act and also to file written submissions. We find from copy of the adjournment petition that ld. CIT(A) – 2, Hyderabad
2 M. Narsing Rao, Hyd.
had adjourned the case to 28/07/2017 to be heard at 3.15 p.m. While
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Chandan Kumar Bathual vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, Cuttack-Iii Range, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Manoranjan Sadangi vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, Gopalpur Range, GanjamOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Bijaya Kumar Parekh vs. State Tax Officer, CT And GST Balangir Circle, BalangirOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Puspanjali Bhuyan vs. The Commissioner Of CT And GST, OdishaOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S A2Z Infra Engineering LTD vs. Union Of INDIA And Ors.Calcutta · 14 Oct 2026