THE KRANTHI CO-OPERATIVE URBAN BANK LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-11(1), HYDERABAD
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that interest on zero coupon bonds is not taxable on an accrual basis, following the Delhi High Court and a coordinate bench of the ITAT. The CBDT circular cannot override the legal provisions of the Income Tax Act to the disadvantage of the assessee.
What were the facts?
The assessee, a cooperative bank, purchased zero coupon bonds. The Assessing Officer taxed the interest income on an accrual basis, relying on a CBDT circular. The assessee contended that no income had accrued as the market value of the bonds remained the same from purchase to the financial year-end.
What were the issues?
Whether interest income on zero coupon bonds is taxable on an accrual basis, and the applicability of CBDT circulars in this regard.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 2(48),Section 2(42A)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, HYDERABAD BENCH “B”, HYDERABAD
Before: SHRI J. SUDHAKAR REDDY & SMT. P. MADHAVI DEVI
PER J. SUDHAKAR REDDY, A.M.:
This is an appeal filed by the assessee directed against the order the Ld. CIT(A) - 5, Hyderabad, dated 25/07/2017 passed u/s 250 of the IT Act, 1961 (the Act), for AY 2013-14. 2. Assessee in this case is a cooperative society, engaged in the banking business. The sole issue that arises for our consideration is whether interest income is taxable on accrual basis on ‘zero coupon bonds’ purchased by the assessee. Section 2(48) defines ‘zero coupon bond’, as under:
"zero coupon bond" means a bond— (a) issued by any infrastructure capital company or infrastructure capital fund or public sector company or scheduled bank on or after the 1st day of June, 2005; (b) in respect of which no
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 2(42A)
- Venkataswaroop Reddy Siddavarapu, Chennai vs DCIT, Corp. Circle-3(1)Chennai, ChennaiITA 1726/CHNY/2026[2022-23]Status: Disposed23 Sept 2026AY 2022-23
- Edwise International Prop Edwise… vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Cirlce…ITA 4878/MUM/2025[2013-14]Status: Disposed22 Sept 2026AY 2013-14
- Ramkumar HUF, Trichy vs ITO, Ward-3(2), TrichyITA 2076/CHNY/2026[2013-14]Status: Disposed1 Sept 2026AY 2013-14
- Joint Commissioner of Income Tax OSD Circle… vs Devikaben Navnitlal Patel, AhmedabadITA 476/AHD/2026[2016-17]Status: Disposed20 Aug 2026AY 2016-17
- DCIT-16(2), Mumbai vs Ashim Ashitbaran Desai, MumbaiITA 3381/MUM/2026[2022-23]Status: Disposed17 Aug 2026AY 2022-23
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- A.Merchy Clara vs. The Commissioner Of GST And Central Excise (Appeals)Madras · 13 Oct 2026
- Nallathambi Thangaraj vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer - IMadras · 13 Oct 2026
- Iyyanan Eswaran vs. The Appellate Deputy Commissioner (St) (GST)Madras · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S. Hira Films PVT. LTD. vs. M/S. Prasad Film Labs (Mumbai) Private LimitedBombay · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Jung Bahadur Singh, Through Its Proprietor, Jang Bahadur Singh vs. The Union Of INDIA, Through Its Secretary, Ministry Of Finance, Department Of RevenueJharkhand · 13 Oct 2026