SHRI AJAY T.PATEL,HUF,SURAT vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER,WARD-3(2), SURAT
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal, following a coordinate bench decision, restored the matter to the file of the AO for fresh adjudication. This was done to allow the AO to consider the details filed by the assessee regarding agricultural income and N.A. charges.
What were the facts?
The assessee sold non-agricultural land and did not show the sale consideration as per Section 50C of the Income Tax Act. The Assessing Officer (AO) re-opened the case, treating a portion of the sale as escaped assessment. The assessee also claimed agricultural income and made payments for N.A. charges, which were questioned by the AO.
What were the issues?
Whether the sale consideration was correctly declared as per Section 50C and whether the agricultural income and N.A. charges were substantiated with proper evidence.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘’SURAT’’ BENCH, SURAT
Before: SHRI RAJPAL YADAV & SHRI AMARJIT SINGH
PER AMARJIT SINGH, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER:
These three appeals of the assessee for A.Y. 2007-08 are against separate orders of the ld.CIT(A)-IV, Ahmedabad of even dated i.e. dated
ITA No.2643/Ahd/2013 and 2 Others 2 20/09/2013 passed in the cases of three different asses
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 50C
- M N S Barium Salts, Kadapa vs ITO, Ward-1, KadapaITA 2412/HYD/2025[2020-21]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Sawalchand Chunilal Bafna HUF, Mumbai vs Income Tax Officer-16(1)(1), MumbaiITA 7492/MUM/2025[2011-12]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2011-12
- Jagdishbhai Vasharambhai Italiya, Ahmedabad vs The ITO, Ward-3(1)(1), AhmedabadITA 150/AHD/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Rohini Ramhari Bhadale, Pune vs Assessing Officer Ward 2(2) Pune, PuneITA 2767/PUN/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- Sweta Somani, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 44(2), KolkataITA 1656/KOL/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Chandan Kumar Bathual vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, Cuttack-Iii Range, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Manoranjan Sadangi vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, Gopalpur Range, GanjamOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Bijaya Kumar Parekh vs. State Tax Officer, CT And GST Balangir Circle, BalangirOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Puspanjali Bhuyan vs. The Commissioner Of CT And GST, OdishaOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S A2Z Infra Engineering LTD vs. Union Of INDIA And Ors.Calcutta · 14 Oct 2026