GRAVITY MERCHANDISE PVT. LTD.,KOLKATA vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE 4(2), KOLKATA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the assessee failed to produce sufficient evidence regarding the purchase price and consideration of the shares of M/s Alom Extrusion Ltd., a sister concern. Despite opportunities, the assessee could not substantiate the claim of loss.
What were the facts?
The assessee claimed a loss on the sale of shares of a group concern, M/s Alom Extrusion Ltd., which was formerly known as Om Development Limited. The Assessing Officer (AO) and the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) disallowed this claim.
What were the issues?
Whether the assessee has provided adequate evidence to support the claim of loss on sale of shares, particularly when the shares were of a sister concern and purchase details were not furnished.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 147,Section 148,Section 143(3),Section 227(2),Section 227(3),Section 209
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(1)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- Addl. CIT v. Jay Engineering Works Ltd.92 citing113 ITR 389 · 1978 · HC
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “SMC” BENCH KOLKATA
Before: SHRI GEORGE MATHAN
This is an appeal filed by the assessee against the order of the ld CIT(A), Kolkata-27, dated 18.11.2024, passed for the assessment year 2016-2017. 2. Shri A.K.Tibrewal, ld. AR appeared on behalf of the assessee and Shri S.B.Chakraborthy, ld.Sr. DR appeared on behalf of the revenue.
It was submitted by the ld.AR that the assessee when filing his return of income had claimed a loss of Rs.34,93,533/- on the sale of shares of a group concern company namely M/s Alom Extrusion Ltd. It was t
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Md. Akhtar Ansari, Proprietor Of M/S Indian Associates vs. State Of Jharkhand, Through Commissioner Of State Tax, Commercial Tax Dept.Jharkhand · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S. Amarjothi Granites (INDIA) PVT. LTD., Berhampur, Ganjam vs. The Commissioner, Commercial Tax And GST, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S. Mishka Steels LLP And Anr. vs. The Superintendent Of Central Goods And Service Tax, Cx, Range-Ii, Behala Div. And Ors.Calcutta · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Gujarat Co-Operative Milk Marketing Federation Limited vs. Union Of INDIAGujarat · 14 Oct 2026
- Ramesh K Devadiga vs. Khernagar Nandadeep Co Operative Housing Society LTDBombay · 14 Oct 2026