SAYED SOFICK ALI,KOLKATA vs. ITO, WARD 3(3), MALDA
Before: Shri Duvvuru RL Reddy, Vice-(KZ)
The present appeal is directed at the instance of assessee against the order of Id. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals),
Jalpaiguri dated 12.03.2019 passed for Assessment Year 2014-
2015. Sayed Sofick Ali
The appeal is time barred by 1594 days in filing the appeal before the Tribunal. The assessee did not file the condonation petition for condoning the delay even inspite of receipt of the defect memo. This Tribunal has given sufficient opportunities to the assessee to file condonation petition but there was no representation for last two hearings. It was the submission of the ld. Departmental Representative that the assessee has not shown any interest to prosecute this appeal and he pleaded to dismiss the appeal filed by the assessee.
Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, since there is no condonation petition, to condone the huge day of 1594 days, I am of the considered view that there is no sufficient reason to condone the delay. Hence this appeal is not maintainable in the eyes of law, hence dismissed in limine.
In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed. Order pronounced in the open Court on 25/07/2025. (Duvvuru RL Reddy) Vice-President (KZ)
Kolkata, the 25th day of July, 2025
Copies to :(1) Sayed Sofick Ali,
C/o. S.N. Ghosh & Associates, Advocates,
2, Garstin Place, 2nd Floor, Suite No. 203,
Off Hare Street, Kolkata-700001
Sayed Sofick Ali
(2) Income Tax Officer,
Ward-3(3), Malda,
Income Tax Office, First Floor,
Netaji Commercial Market,
P.O. & P.S. Malda, Dist. Malda-732101, W.B.
(3) CIT(A), Jalpaiguri;
(4) CIT - , Kolkata;
(5) The Departmental Representative;
(6)
Guard FileBy order