← Back to search

MAGAN MAL SETHIA,KOLKATA vs. ITO, WARD 33(1), KOLKATA

PDF
ITA 181/KOL/2025[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata09 September 20252 pages

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “C” BENCH, KOLKATA

BEFORE SHRI GEORGE MATHAN, JUDICIAL MEMBER
AND SHRI RAKESH MISHRA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER
Magan Mal Sethia,
5 Russel Street,
Kolkata-700071
Vs ITO, Ward-33(1), Kolkata

PAN No. :ALOPS 2055 G

(अपीलधर्थी /Appellant)
..
(प्रत्यर्थी / Respondent)

निर्धाररती की ओर से /Assessee by : Shri Miraj D Shah, AR
रधजस्व की ओर से /Revenue by : Shri Sandeep Lakra, Sr. DR
सुनवाई की तारीख / Date of Hearing
:
08/09/2025
घोषणा की तारीख/Date of Pronouncement
:
08/09/2025
आदेश / O R D E R
Per George Mathan, JM:

This is an appeal filed by the assessee against the order passed by the ld.CIT(A), National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi, dated
05.12.2024 for the assessment year 2015-2016. 2. It was submitted by the ld AR that the ld. CIT(A) has dismissed the appeal of the assessee without providing any sufficient opportunity of being heard to the assessee. It was the prayer that the matter may be restored to the file of ld. CIT(A) to decide the issue involved in the appeal afresh so that the assessee could be able to produce all the evidence to substantiate his claim.
3. In reply, ld Sr. DR vehemently supported the orders of the Assessing
Officer and ld. CIT(A). It was the submission that the assessee has not produced any evidence either before the ld. Assessing Officer or before the ld. CIT(A).

ITANo.181/Kol/2025

2
4. We have considered the rival submissions. As it is noticed from the impugned order the assessee could not substantiate its claim by providing relevant documents before the ld. CIT(A) in appellate proceedings.
However, the ld. AR has made a request before the Bench that if the assessee is given one more opportunity to represent its case before the ld.
CIT(A), the assessee could be able to provide all the details before the ld.
CIT(A) to substantiate its claim. This being so, in the interest of justice, we grant the assessee one more opportunity to substantiate its claim before the ld. CIT(A) by restoring the issues in the appeal to the file of ld. CIT(A) for adjudicating afresh after providing the assessee adequate opportunity of being heard. The assessee shall cooperate in the readjudication proceeding before the ld.CIT(A) positively.
5. In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes.
Order dictated and pronounced in the open court on 08/09/2025. (RAKESH MISHRA) (GEORGE MATHAN)
लेखा सदस्य/ ACCOUNTANT MEMBER
न्यधनयक सदस्य / JUDICIAL MEMBER
कोलकाता Kolkata; ददनाांक Dated 08/09/2025
Prakash Kumar Mishra, Sr.P.S.
आदेश की प्रनतललपप अग्रेपर्त/Copy of the Order forwarded to :

आदेशधिुसधर/ BY ORDER,

(

MAGAN MAL SETHIA,KOLKATA vs ITO, WARD 33(1), KOLKATA | BharatTax