SUSTAINABLE TRANSPORT AMD EFFICIENT MOBILITY SOCIETY,SHILLONG vs. CIT(EXEMPTIONS), KOLKATA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that the letter for withdrawal was self-explanatory and the CIT-DR had no objection. Consequently, the Bench granted permission for the assessee to withdraw the appeal. The appeal filed by the assessee was therefore dismissed as withdrawn.
What were the facts?
The assessee, Sustainable Transport AMD Efficient Mobility Society, appealed against the CIT(Exemptions)'s order dated 25.03.2025, which rejected its application under Section 12A of the Income Tax Act, 1961. During the proceedings, the authorized representative of the assessee filed a letter seeking permission to withdraw the appeal.
What were the issues?
Whether to grant permission for the appellant to withdraw its appeal against the rejection of its Section 12A application.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “D” BENCH KOLKATA
Before: Shri Rajesh Kumar & Shri Pradip Kumar Choubey
Assessment Year: 2024-25 Sustainable Transport AMD Efficient Mobility Society …….……….……Appellant Pine Mount Ridge, Opposite Pine Mount School, Shillong, Meghalaya-793001. [PAN: ABVAS9315F] vs. CIT(Exemptions), Kolkata………………………………….....……...…..…..Respondent Appearances by: Shri Somnath Ghosh, Advocate, appeared on behalf of the appellant. Shri Sanat Kumar Raha, CIT- DR, appeared on behalf of the Respondent. Date of concluding the hearing : September 04, 2025 Date of pronouncing the order : September 11, 2025 ORDER
Per Pradip Kumar Choubey, Judicial Member:
The present appeal has been preferred by the assessee against the order dated 25.03.2025 of the CIT(Exemption), Kolkata [hereinafter referred to as the “ld. CIT(E)”] rejecting the application u/s 12A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 [hereinafter referred to as the “Act”].
At the outset, the authorized representative of the assessee has 2. filed a letter dated 03.09.2025 seeking permission of the Bench to withdraw this appeal filed by the assessee and the letter is self- explanatory. Since the ld. DR has no objection in this regard, the permission as sought by the assessee is granted and this appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.
Kolkata, the 11th September, 2025.
More judgments on Section 12A
- Desire Foundation, Jaipur vs Income Tax Officer, JaipurITA 1646/JPR/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Sanskardham Nandan, Mehsana vs CIT(Exemption), AhmedabadITA 2980/AHD/2026[2025-26]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2025-26
- Global University Foundation, Hyderabad vs CIT(Exemption), HyderabadITA 777/HYD/2026[2026-27]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
- Global University Foundation, Hyderabad vs CIT(Exemption), HyderabadITA 776/HYD/2026[2026-27]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
- Shiva Shiksha Samiti, Deendayal Puram, Up… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward-Exemption, Agra…ITA 415/AGR/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S. Saraswati Enterprises vs. State Of RajasthanRajasthan · 28 Oct 2026
- Akshaya Consortium vs. The Assistant Commissioner (St)Andhra Pradesh · 28 Oct 2026
- Dipanshu Aggarwal vs. Director General Of GST IntelligenceDelhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Dezinetree Projects PVT. LTD. vs. Spokes Digital Inc And AnrDelhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Jaydeep Jayantilal Hudaka vs. State Of GujaratGujarat · 28 Oct 2026