ANJANI AGARWAL,KOLKATA vs. PCIT (CENTRAL) KOLKATA - 2, , KOLKATA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the PCIT invalidly invoked Section 263 as the AO had conducted an inquiry and accepted the assessee's explanation regarding the share valuation. The AO's assessment was deemed neither erroneous nor prejudicial to the revenue.
What were the facts?
The assessee purchased shares for ₹1,86,76,115, which the PCIT considered undervalued compared to the market value of ₹4,78,54,490. The PCIT initiated revisionary proceedings under Section 263, alleging the AO's assessment was erroneous and prejudicial to revenue.
What were the issues?
Whether the PCIT validly invoked Section 263 when the AO had already conducted an inquiry and accepted the assessee's explanation regarding share valuation?
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 263,Section 143(3),Section 56(2)(x)(c),Section 142(1)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(8)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- Malabar Industrial Co. Ltd. v. CIT2,943 citing243 ITR 83 · 2000 · SC · Read judgment
- CIT v. Max India Ltd.1,162 citing295 ITR 282 · 2007 · SC
- CIT v. Sunbeam Auto Ltd.897 citing332 ITR 167 · 2011 · HC · Read judgment
- CIT v. J.L. Morrison (India) Ltd.124 citing366 ITR 593 · 2014 · HC
- 232 (Gujarat)\n• Principal Commissioner of Income Tax v. V-Con Integrated Solutions\n(p.) Ltd.33 citing173 Taxmann.com 774 · 2025 · SC
- Principal Commissioner of Income-tax v. Britannia Industries Ltd.18 citing146 Taxmann.com 246 · 2023 · HC · Read judgment
- Pr. CIT v. V-con Integrated Solutions P. Ltd.14 citing173 Taxmann.com 773 · 2025 · HC · Read judgment
- Ultratech Cement Ltd. v. State of Rajasthan12 citing117 Taxmann.com 807 · 2020 · SC
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “A” BENCH, KOLKATA
Per Rajesh Kumar, AM:
This is an appeal preferred by the assessee against the revisionary order of the ld. Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax(hereinafter referred to as the “Ld. PCIT”] dated 24.01.2025 for the AY 2021-22. 02. The only issue raised by the assessee in the various grounds of appeal is against the invalid exercise of juri iction u/s 263 of the Act by the ld PCIT and consequently, order passed by the ld. PCIT u/s 263 of the Act was also invalid and nullity in the eyes of law.
The facts in brief are that the ld. AO framed the assessment u/s 143(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (the Act) on 29.12.223, assessing the total income at ₹12,13,10,290/- as against the N
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 263
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Neo Structo Construction P. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The Pr. CIT- 3, AhmedabadITA 1216/AHD/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- Vimal Harilal Baldania, Gandhidham vs The ITO Ward 2, GandhidhamITA 770/RJT/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1493/KOL/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1492/KOL/2026[2013-2014]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2013-2014
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S. Middlex, Puri vs. Commnr. Of State Tax, Banijyakar Bhawan, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Maa Sunadei Indane Gramin Vitrak, Nayagarh vs. Commissioner Of CT And GST, Cuttack, OdishaOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Sunanda Raul vs. The Commissioner Of Commercial Taxes And Goods Nad Services Tax, OdishaOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Zakir Hussain Ali Khan vs. Additional Commissioner (Appeals), BhubaneswarOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Manorama Nayak, Khorda vs. Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, CT And GST, Bhubaneswar Iv Circle, KhurdaOrissa · 14 Oct 2026