THE CUDDALORE DISTRICT CENTRAL CO-OP. BANK LTD.,CUDDALORE vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-1, , CUDDALORE

PDF · subscribers
ITA 2669/CHNY/2024Status: DisposedITAT Chennai09 January 2025AY 2018-19Bench: SHRI MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL (Accountant Member), SHRI MANU KUMAR GIRI (Judicial Member)1 pages

In favour of the assessee: the assessee's appeal was allowed. From the AI summary of this appeal.

AI SummaryAllowed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal held that it is in the interest of justice to give the assessee one more opportunity to present their case before the CIT(A). The appeal was set aside for denovo adjudication.

What were the facts?

The assessee's appeal was dismissed ex-parte by the CIT(A) because the assessee failed to respond to notices on three occasions. The assessment order was passed under Section 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

What were the issues?

Whether the assessee should be given another opportunity to present their case before the CIT(A) after failing to respond to previous notices.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 250

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘B’ BENCH, CHENNAI

Before: HON’BLE SHRI MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL & HON’BLE SHRI MANU KUMAR GIRI

Hearing: 18.12.2024Pronounced: 09.01.2025

PER MANU KUMAR GIRI (Judicial Member) This appeal by the assessee is arising out of the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi in order No.ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2024-25/1068009690(1) dated 27.08.2024. The assessment was framed by the Additional/Joint/Deputy/Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax/ Income-tax Officer, National e-Assessment Centre, Delhi u/s. 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter the ‘Act’) for the assessment year 2018-19 vide order dated 27.08.2024. 2. We have heard the rival contentions and perused the material on record. We found that the ld. CIT(A) has issued notices on three occasions and the assessee did not respond, hence, the ld. CIT(A) has dismissed the appeal ex-parte on the merits of the grounds of appeal raised by the assessee.

3.

We are of the considered view that in the interest of justice assessee should be given one more opportunity before ld.CIT(A) to file all relevant evidences/documents to prosecute his case. Therefore, in the light of aforesaid factual position and for the substantial justice, we deem it fit to set aside this appeal to the file of ld.CIT(A) for denovo adjudication of appeal. The Ld.CIT(A) who shall proceed for denovo adjudication of appeal after providing proper opportunity of hearing to the assessee. The assessee is directed to substantiate its case forthwith without any fail, failing which Ld.CIT(A) shall be at liberty to proceed with the appellate proceedings as per law.

4.

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purpose. Order pronounced in the open court on 9th day of January, 2025 (मनोज कुमार अ"वाल) (मनु कुमार िग"र) (MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL) (MANU KUMAR GIRI) लेखा सद" / ACCOUNTANT MEMBER "ाियक सद" / JUDICIAL MEMBER चे"ई Chennai: िदनांक Dated :09-01-2025 KV आदेश क" ""त"ल"प अ"े"षत /Copy to : 1. अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""थ"/Respondent आयकरआयु"/CIT,

2.3.

Chennai/Coimbatore/Madurai/Salem. 4. िवभागीय"ितिनिध/DR 5. गाड"फाईल/GF

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →