MURTHY SHEKHAR,CHENNAI vs. DCIT, NCC-7(1), CHENNAI

आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण, ’सी’ ᭠यायपीठ, चे᳖ई।
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
‘C’ BENCH: CHENNAI

ŵी एबी टी. वकŎ, Ɋाियक सद˟ एवं
ŵी जगदीश, लेखा सद˟ के समƗ

BEFORE SHRI ABY T. VARKEY, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI JAGADISH, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER

आयकर अपील सं./ITA No.1837/Chny/2024
िनधाᭅरणवषᭅ/Assessment Year: 2015-16

Murthy Shekhar,
T 46/4, 2nd Floor,
3rd Avenue,
Anna Nagar S.O. (Chennai),
Anna Nagar,
Chennai-600 040. v.
The DCIT,
NCC-7(1),
Chennai.
[PAN: ANIPS 2743 P]

(अपीलाथᱮ/Appellant)

(ᮧ᭜यथᱮ/Respondent)

अपीलाथᱮ कᳱ ओर से/ Appellant by :
Mr.N. Arjun Raj, Advocate
ᮧ᭜यथᱮ कᳱ ओर से /Respondent by :
Ms. Anitha, Addl.CIT
सुनवाईकᳱतारीख/Date of Hearing
:
08.01.2025
घोषणाकᳱतारीख /Date of Pronouncement
:
15.01.2025

आदेश / O R D E R
PER ABY T. VARKEY, JM:

This is an appeal preferred by the assessee against the order of the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)/NFAC, (hereinafter referred to as ‘Ld.CIT(A)‘), Delhi, dated 20.06.2024 for the Assessment
Year (hereinafter referred to as ‘AY‘) 2015-16. 2. At the outset, the Ld.AR of the assessee brought to our notice that assessee has opted for Vivad-Se-Vishwas Scheme, 2024 (hereinafter in Murthy Shekhar
:: 2 ::

short ‘VSVS-2024’) and pursuant to it, assessee has filed Form-1 dated
16.12.2024, pursuant to which designated authority [PCIT] issued Form-
2, dated 17.12.2024, copy of which is filed before us. Therefore, the assessee is remitting of Rs.85,216/- to settle the issue under VSVS-2024. Therefore, assessee expressed his desire to withdraw the appeal. The Revenue doesn’t have any objection.
3. In the light of the aforesaid discussion, appeal stands dismissed as withdrawn.
4. In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn under VSVS-2024. Order pronounced on the 15th day of January, 2025, in Chennai. (जगदीश)
(JAGADISH)
लेखा सद˟/ACCOUNTANT MEMBER
(एबी टी. वकŎ)
(ABY T. VARKEY)
᭠याियक सद᭭य/JUDICIAL MEMBER
चे᳖ई/Chennai,
ᳰदनांक/Dated: 15th January, 2025. TLN, Sr.PS
आदेश कᳱ ᮧितिलिप अᮕेिषत/Copy to: