EUGEN PETER EIGENMANN,VILLUPURAM vs. ITO, WARD-3,, PUDUCHERRY
आयकर अपीलȣय अͬधकरण, ‘डी’ Ûयायपीठ, चेÛनई
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
‘D’ BENCH, CHENNAI
Įी जॉज[ जॉज[ के, उपाÚय¢ एवं Įी अिमताभ शुला, लेखा सदèय के सम¢
BEFORE SHRI GEORGE GEORGE K, VICE PRESIDENTAND
SHRI AMITABH SHUKLA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER
आयकर अपील सं./ITA No.: 2999/CHNY/2024
िनधाᭅरण वषᭅ/Assessment Year: 2011-12
Shri Eugen Peter Eigenmann,
Block B6, Courage,
Auroville,
Villupuram – 605 101. PAN: AAOPE 3743Q
Vs.
The Income Tax Officer,
Ward – 3,
Puducherry.
(अपीलाथᱮ/Appellant)
(ᮧ᭜यथᱮ/Respondent)
अपीलाथᱮ कᳱ ओर से/Appellant by : Shri H. Yeshwanth Kumar, CA
ᮧ᭜यथᱮ कᳱ ओर से/Respondent by : Shri S. Easwar, JCIT
सुनवाई कᳱ तारीख/Date of Hearing : 21.01.2025
घोषणा कᳱ तारीख/Date of Pronouncement : 21.01.2025
आदेश /O R D E R
PER GEORGE GEORGE K, VICE PRESIDENT:
This appeal at the instance of the assessee is directed against the CIT(A)/NFAC’s order dated 26.09.2024, passed under section 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter called ‘the Act’). The relevant Assessment Year is 2011-12. 2. At the time of hearing, the ld.AR for the assessee has filed copy of Form 1 filed under Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2024
(DTVSV 2024) and stated that assessee has opted for Direct Tax
Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2024. In light of the above, we dismiss the appeal of the assessee with a liberty to reinstate the appeal if his application under Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2024, is not accepted.
In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.
Order pronounced in the open court on 21st January, 2025 at Chennai. (अिमताभ शुला)
(AMITABH SHUKLA)
लेखा सदèय/ACCOUNTANT MEMBER
(जॉज[ जॉज[ के)
(GEORGE GEORGE K)
उपाÚय¢ /VICE PRESIDENT
चेÛनई/Chennai,
Ǒदनांक/Dated, the 21st January, 2025
RSR
आदेश कȧ ĤǓतͧलͪप अĒेͪषत/Copy to:
अपीलाथȸ/Appellant
Ĥ×यथȸ/Respondent 3. आयकर आयुÈत /CIT, Chennai 4. ͪवभागीय ĤǓतǓनͬध/DR 5. गाड[ फाईल/GF.