KARAIKUDI MUSLIM WELFARE TRUST,SIVAGANGAI vs. CIT (EXEMPTIONS), CHENNAI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing the appeal and admitted it. Considering the assessee's submission regarding the trustee's unfamiliarity with online operations and the interest of justice, the Tribunal set aside the order and remanded the case to the CIT(E) for a fresh hearing.
What were the facts?
The assessee trust applied for registration under Section 12AA and exemption under Section 80G. The CIT(E) rejected the application as not maintainable after the assessee failed to provide requested documents within the stipulated time. The assessee appealed this decision.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(E) was justified in rejecting the application for exemption without providing adequate opportunity, and whether the Tribunal should grant another opportunity to the assessee?
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘B’ BENCH, CHENNAI
Before: HON’BLE SHRI MANU KUMAR GIRI & HON’BLE SHRI JAGADISH
Karaikudi Muslim Welfare Trust, Vs. The Commissioner of Income 1A, KF Towers, Opp to BSNL Office, Tax, Netaji Road, Near Bus Stand, (Exemptions) Karaikudi, Sivagangai Dist. 630 003. Chennai. [PAN: AACTK 9775A] (अपीलाथ�/Appellant) (��यथ�/Respondent) अपीलाथ� क� ओर से/ Appellant by : Shri. M. Ramasamy, C.A., ��यथ� क� ओर से /Respondent by : Shri. M. Rajan, IRS, CIT. सुनवाई क� तार�ख/Date of Hearing : 22.01.2025 घोषणा क� तार�ख /Date of Pronouncement : 27.01.2025 आदेश / O R D E R MANU KUMAR GIRI (Judicial Member) This appeal preferred by the appellant / assessee is against the impugned order dated 21.08.2024 passed by the ld. Commissioner of Income Tax(Exemption), Chennai in Application No.CIT (Exemption), Chennai /2024-25 /12AA /11107 vide DIN & Notice No.ITBA /EXM/F /EXM45/2024-25/1067838759(1).
The registry has noted delay of 08 days in filing the appeal. Considering the period of delay and reasons stated in condonation petition alongwith affidavit by the Managing Trustee of the Assessee, we condone the delay and admit the appeal for adjudication.
3. Brief facts are as under: The assessee trust applied for the registration u/s 12AA of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (‘Act’ in short) on 18.03.2024 and provisional registration was granted on 01.04.2024. The assessee also applied for the section 80G Exemption before the ld.CIT(E), Chennai by filing Form No.10AB on 18.03.2024. Thereafter, the ld.CIT(E) vide letter dated 12.07.2024 through e-filing portal requested the assessee to furnish the relevant documents / details and its clarifications either by uploading online in the e-filing portal or by post, on or before 22.07.2024. However, no response from the applicant to letter dated 12.07.2024 or notice dated 29.07.2024. Hence, having no choice, the ld.CIT(E) rejected the application as not maintainable. Assessee is in further appeal before us.
At the outset, Ld.AR for the appellant submitted that the Managing trustee is 75 yrs old and is not familiar with the online mails and digital operation etc. The Ld.AR for the appellant prayed that if an adequate opportunity of hearing is given before ld.CIT(E), assessee will file requisite details called for and prosecute the application properly. Ld.CIT-DR relied upon the order of ld.CIT(E) and prayed for dismissal of appeal.
We have gone through the orders of lower authorities and submissions addressed by the parties before us. We are of the considered view that in the interest of justice assessee should be given one more opportunity before ld.CIT(E) to prosecute the application his case. The ld.AR for the assessee also filed the below mentioned undertaking as under: To The Hon'ble Members, B-Bench, Income Tax Appellate Tribunal,
More judgments on Section 12AA
- Yashaswi Academy for Skills, Pune vs PCIT (Central), PuneITA 2448/PUN/2026[NA]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026
- Yashaswi Academy for Skills, Pune vs PCIT (Central), PuneITA 2447/PUN/2026[NA]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026
- Sri Jawahar Education Trust, Chamarajanagar vs The Income Tax Officer Ward 1…ITA 1735/BANG/2026[2016-17]Status: Disposed5 Oct 2026AY 2016-17
- Punjab Urban Planning and Development… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward 6(1), MohaliITA 636/CHANDI/2024[2021-22]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Punjab Urban Planning and Development… vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle…ITA 635/CHANDI/2024[2017-18]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Shining Steel Through Its Proprietor Kartik Gupta vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Redamancy World Through Its Proprietor Sanjay Kumar Goel vs. Central Board Of Indirect Taxes And Customs & Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Arj Exim INDIA vs. Additional Commissioner Of CGST, Appeals-Ii, New Delhi And OrsDelhi · 27 Oct 2026
- The State Of Bihar Through The Commissioner Of State Tax vs. Kaushlendra KumarPatna · 27 Oct 2026
- Ayush Sureshchandra Shah vs. State Of GujaratGujarat · 27 Oct 2026