M/S. MARUTHI SAW MILLS,TIRUCHIRAPALLI vs. PCIT, MADURAI-II,, MADURAI
आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण, ‘बी’ यायपीठ, चे ई।
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
‘B’ BENCH: CHENNAI
ी एबी टी. वक
, ाियक सद एवं
एवं
एवं
एवं
ी अिमताभ शुा, लेखा सद के सम
BEFORE SHRI ABY T. VARKEY, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI AMITABH SHUKLA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER
आयकर अपील सं./ITA No. 1686/Chny/2024
िनधारण वष/Assessment Year: 2017-18
M/s. Maruthi Saw Mills
Represented by Partner
Sri. Suresh Patel
No. 1/4, Varmadam Road, Tennur,
Tiruchirappalli – 620 017, Tamil Nadu v.
The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax,
Madurai -1
Madurai.
[PAN:] AAAFM6556D
(अपीलाथ/Appellant)
(यथ/Respondent)
अपीलाथ क ओर से/ Appellant by :
Mr. K. Meenakshi Sundaram,
ITP
यथ क ओर से /Respondent by :
Mr. Nilay Baran Som, CIT
सुनवाईकतारीख/Date of Hearing
:
24.12.2024
घोषणाकतारीख /Date of Pronouncement
:
05.02.2025
आदेश / O R D E R
PER ABY T. VARKEY, JM:
This is an appeal preferred by the assessee M/s Maruthi Saw Mills against the order of the Learned Principal Commissioner of Income Tax,
Madurai -1 (hereinafter in short “Ld.PCIT") dated 24.03.2022 for assessment year 2017-18 (hereinafter in short “AY").
At the outset, the Ld.AR of the assessee Shri. K. Meenakshi Sundaram, ITP submitted that the assessee has instructed him to M/s Maruthi Saw Mills, Trichy :: 2 ::
withdraw the captioned appeal. Per contra, the Ld.DR doesn’t object to the request of assessee. In the light of the above discussion, we allow the request of the Assessee to withdraw the captioned appeal.
In the result, appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.
Order pronounced on 05th February, 2025 at Chennai. (अिमताभ शुा)
(AMITABH SHUKLA)
लेखा सदय/ACCOUNTANT MEMBER (एबी टी. वक
)
(ABY T. VARKEY)
याियक सदय/JUDICIAL MEMBER
चे ई/Chennai,
िदनांक/Dated: 05th February, 2025. RL/-
आदेश क ितिलिप अ!ेिषत/Copy to:
1. अपीलाथ/Appellant
2. थ/Respondent
3. आयकरआयु/CIT, Chennai
4. िवभागीयितिनिध/DR
5. गाड!फाईल/GF