SRI. K. I. VENKATESH,BANGALORE vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD- 8(3), BANGALORE
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that the issues contested in the appeal had been settled under the Vivad Se Vishwas Act. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against a penalty levied under Section 271(1)(c) for the assessment year 1998-99. The assessee had also filed an application under the Direct Taxes Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020, for the quantum appeal.
What were the issues?
Whether the penalty appeal abates due to settlement of the quantum appeal under the Vivad Se Vishwas Act.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘C’ BENCH : BANGALORE
Before: SHRI. CHANDRA POOJARI & SMT. BEENA PILLAI
ORDER PER BEENA PILLAI, JUDICIAL MEMBER Present appeal by the assessee has been filed by assessee against the order dated 13.03.2012 by ITO, Ward-8(2), Bangalore u/s. 271(1)(c) of the Act for assessment year 1998-99.
The Ld.AR submitted that the appeal relates to penalty levied u/s. 271(1)(c) of the Act. In the letter filed before us today, it is submitted that the assessee filed application under VSVS in respect of quantum appeal, filed before the Hon’ble High Court of Karnataka in ITA 52/2020.
Page 2 of The assessee has filed Form No. 4, 5 for the appeal filed by the assessee. Accordingly it is submitted that present penalty appeal get abated.
We heard Ld D.R, who did not object to the prayer of the assessee. Since the issues contested in the appeal of the assessee have been settled under the Direct Taxes Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020, we dismiss the appeal of the assessee as withdrawn. However, we give liberty to the revenue/assessee to seek recall of this order in accordance with law, if the circumstances so warrant.
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn. Order pronounced in the open court on 07th December, 2021.
More judgments on Section 271(1)(c)
- Ajaybhai Dineshbhai Bagdai, Near Central… vs The Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(2)(1), New…ITA 74/RJT/2026[2013-14]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2013-14
- Shalin Jayantbhai Desai, Vadodara vs ACIT, Circle-4(2), Vadodara Present…ITA 2569/AHD/2026[2010-11]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2010-11
- Neo Structo Construction P. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The Pr. CIT- 3, AhmedabadITA 1216/AHD/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- Hetal Vinodchandra Sheth, Ahmedabad vs The ITO, Ward-5(3)(1), AhmedabadITA 2370/AHD/2025[2014-15]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Hetal Vinodchandra Sheth, Ahmedabad vs The ITO, Ward-5(3)(1), AhmedabadITA 2369/AHD/2025[2014-15]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Ramshrayashil Constructions PVT.LTD vs. Union Of INDIA Through The Secretary, Ministry Of Finance, Government Of INDIAJharkhand · 2 Nov 2026
- M/S. Kiea Corporate Business Solutions vs. The Deputy State Tax OfficerTelangana · 2 Nov 2026
- M/S. Vrajman Enterprises vs. The Deputy State Tax OfficerTelangana · 2 Nov 2026
- Nimmakayala Padmavathi vs. The Union Of INDIAAndhra Pradesh · 2 Nov 2026
- Som Nath Nagar Mal Th Partner Sanjay Mahajan vs. Union Of INDIA Th Department Of Financial Services, Ministry Of Finance And OthersJammu and Kashmir and Ladakh · 2 Nov 2026