SET INDIA FOUNDATION,TIRUVANNAMALAI vs. CIT, EXEMPTIONS,, CHENNAI

PDF · subscribers
ITA 3122/CHNY/2024Status: DisposedITAT Chennai26 February 20253 pages
AI SummaryAllowed for statistical purposes

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal noted that the application for registration under Section 12AB of the Act was already remitted back to the CIT(Exemption) in a separate appeal. Considering this, and in the interest of justice and equity, the present appeal for approval under Section 80G(5) is also remitted back to the files of the CIT(Exemption) for fresh consideration on merits, with a direction to provide a reasonable opportunity of being heard to the assessee.

What were the facts?

The assessee's application in Form 10AB for approval under Section 80G(5)(iii) of the Income Tax Act was rejected by the CIT(Exemption), Chennai. The rejection was based on the reason that there was no valid registration under Section 12AB of the Act.

What were the issues?

Whether the CIT(Exemption) was justified in rejecting the application for approval under Section 80G(5)(iii) solely due to the absence of valid registration under Section 12AB, when the matter of Section 12AB registration was already under remittance.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 12AB,Section 80G(5),Section 80G(5)(iii)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘B’ BENCH, CHENNAI

Before: SHRI GEORGE GEORGE K & SHRI S.R. RAGHUNATHA

Hearing: 25.02.2025Pronounced: 26.02.2025

Set India Foundation, CIT (Exemption), 2/29, Brahmin Street, Vs. Chennai. Osur Village, Vandavasi TK Osur B.O, Osur – 604 405. Tiruvannamalai. PAN: AALTS-5280-R (अपीलाथ�/Appellant) (��यथ�/Respondent) अपीलाथ� क� ओर से/Appellant by : Mr. N.Arjun Raj, Advocate ��यथ� क� ओर से/Respondent by : Ms. T.M.Suganthamala, CIT सुनवाई क� तारीख/Date of Hearing : 25.02.2025 घोषणा क� तारीख/Date of Pronouncement : 26.02.2025 आदेश /O R D E R

PER GEORGE GEORGE K, VICE PRESIDENT:

1.

This appeal at the instance of the assessee is directed against order of the CIT(Exemption), Chennai dated 15.11.2024 rejecting application filed in Form 10AB u/s.80G(5)(iii) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter called ‘the Act’).

2.

At the very outset, we notice that CIT(E) has rejected the assessee’s application filed in Form 10AB u/s.80G(5)(ii) denying approval for the reason that that there is no valid registration u/s.12AB of the Act. The Ld. AR submitted that since the application for registration u/s.12AB of the Act is already remitted back to the files of CIT(E), this appeal may also be remitted back to the files of CIT(E) for reconsidering the application filed in Form 10AB u/s.80G(5)(iii) seeking approval.

3.

The Ld. DR supported the order of the CIT(E).

4.

We have heard rival submissions and perused material on record. We find that since we have already remitted the application for registration u/s.12AB of the Act in the appeal of the assessee vide order in dated 26.02.2025 to the files of CIT(E), in the interest of justice and equity, this appeal seeking approval u/s.80G(5) is also remitted back to the files of CIT(E) for reconsidering the application filed by the assessee in Form 10AB u/s.80G(5)(iii) of the Act, on merits. The CIT(E) shall afford reasonable opportunity of being heard to the assessee. The assessee trust is directed to co-operate with the Revenue and shall not seek unnecessary adjournment in the matter.

5. In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes. Order pronounced in the open court on 26th February, 2025.

More judgments on Section 12AB

All 5,972 judgments and leading authorities on Section 12AB →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →