← Back to search

THONDAIMANDALAM FOUNDATION,CHENNAI vs. CIT, EXEMPTIONS,, CHENNAI

PDF
ITA 3229/CHNY/2024[-]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai27 February 20252 pages

आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण “सी” ायपीठ चेई म।
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
“C” BENCH, CHENNAI

माननीय ी मनोज कुमार अ वाल ,लेखा सद" एवं
माननीय ी मनु कुमार िग&र, ाियक सद" के सम'।
BEFORE HON’BLE SHRI MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL, AM
AND HON’BLE SHRI MANU KUMAR GIRI, JM

आयकर अपील सं./ ITA No.3229/Chny/2024
Thondaimandalam Foundation
#8B/16, High Breeze Apartment,
Ormes Road 4th Cross Street,
Kilpauk, Chennai-600 010. बनाम
/ Vs.
CIT (Exemptions)
Chennai.
थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./PAN/TAN No. AADTT-6457-F
(अपीलाथ/Appellant)
:
( थ / Respondent)

अपीलाथकीओरसे/ Appellant by :
Shri J. Saravanan (Advocate) – Ld.AR
थकीओरसे/Respondent by :
Shri R. Clement Ramesh Kumar (CIT) -Ld. DR

सुनवाईकीतारीख/Date of Hearing
:
27-02-2025
घोषणाकीतारीख /Date of Pronouncement
:
27-02-2025

आदेश / O R D E R

Manoj Kumar Aggarwal (Accountant Member)

1.

Aggrieved by rejection of an application filed in Form No.10AB seeking approval u/s 80G(5)(iii) vide impugned order dated 25.09.2023 of Ld. CIT(Exemption), the assessee is in further appeal before us. 2. The registry has noted delay of 384 days, the condonation of which has been sought by the assessee on the strength of affidavit of Trustee of the assessee-trust. It has been submitted that order of rejection as uploaded on e-filing portal could not be noticed. Considering possibility of communication gaps at various levels in faceless regime, we condone the delay.

3.

Upon perusal of para 10 of impugned order, it could be seen that the application has been rejected as non-maintainable on the ground that the application was filed beyond prescribed time limit. The Ld. AR pleaded that the application was filed on 31-03-2023 within the extended time limit. The Ld. AR prayed for another opportunity of hearing before lower authorities. 3. Keeping in mind the principle of natural justice, we deem it fit to grant another opportunity of hearing to the assessee. Accordingly, the impugned order is set aside and the matter of registration stand restored back to the file of Ld. CIT(E) for re-consideration with a direction to the assessee to plead and prove its application. 4. The appeal stand allowed for statistical purposes. Order pronounced on 27th February, 2025. (MANU KUMAR GIRI) ाियक सद" / JUDICIAL MEMBER (MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL) लेखा सद" / ACCOUNTANT MEMBER

चे0ई Chennai; िदनांक Dated : 27-02-2025
DS

आदेशकीEितिलिपअ ेिषत/Copy of the Order forwarded to :
1. अपीलाथ/Assessee
2. थ/Revenue
3. आयकरआयु9/CIT Chennai/Madurai
4. िवभागीय ितिनिध/DR
5. गाड>फाईल/GF

THONDAIMANDALAM FOUNDATION,CHENNAI vs CIT, EXEMPTIONS,, CHENNAI | BharatTax